Sunday, January 12, 2014

Vaporware by Richard Dansky





Title: Vaporware
Author: Richard Dansky
Publisher: Journalstone
Rating: worthy

Vaporware is a great title for this novel even though it’s actually inaccurate in more ways than one. It’s the kind of title that makes you wish you’d thought it up first, although as one reviewer has already pointed out, Ghost in the Machine is more applicable, if rather more ho-hum. Personally, I would have preferred Blue Lightning! It's right there on the box! Vaporware is a term used to describe software which often arises as a result of a larger corporation wanting to, shall I say, close the window on a smaller outfit. The larger corp announces a product which is essentially the same thing as the cool new app from the start-up or the smaller business, and because everyone now thinks that the mega corp is going to include it free with their operating system, they don’t bother to buy the start-up's version, effectively killing their app. Meanwhile the megacorp never did intend on producing any version of the app, but they still slapped-down and shut-out the competition. Such is business.

This is the first Dansky I've read (and I suspect it’s his first novel), but my initial impressions were good. The novel is well-written - if you ignored some clunkers like the weird sentence at the bottom of p271: "The smell of hot lead drifted then past me as I waited." The story is interesting, so I had no problem continuing to read, and even rather resenting when I had to quit for one reason or another (work is such a killjoy isn’t it?!). Dansky is a game developer, and so the basic situation he's presenting here is that of a small game development company (Horseshoe) beholden to a much larger corporate money bag. The story is told through Ryan, the lead in the development team. It's also told in in first person PoV, which I normally detest, but for some reason it doesn’t seem distractingly obtrusive or weirdly unnatural here. I don’t know why that is. Ryan is one of the senior developers - indeed, this project was his to begin with. He came up with the idea. The funny thing is that I can’t help but see Ryan as a proxy for Dansky! But hey, write what you know, right? Maybe!

Horseshoe has a brand-new game called Blue Lightning which is almost ready for an alpha test release, which means, all being well, that it's not that far from being on sale. It’s your standard first person shooter, but it has a new game engine and some nifty tricks and treats to set it significantly above competitors. While the game is up and running (and playable) it also still needs a lot of final nudges and tweaks before it’s ready for release to the public. The big conflict point in this novel is that on the very day they send a presentation to the money bags for approval to proceed (and some fat corporate bucks to keep them in business) the corporate guy kills the project, and tells them he wants them to begin developing something else - some project named 'Salvador' which is conveniently owned in toto by the bigger corporation, which depresses and pisses-off everyone at Horseshoe. This project is a port (the game has already been developed, but they need a team to prepare it for a different games platform), so this feels like a big slap in the face to the team at Horseshoe.

That's business - or what passes for it in this day and age. The difference here is that the main character in the game seems to have something to say about it! Some really oddball things start happening to Ryan. The first of these was that there was what the developers thought was a brown-out (just a brief glitch in power), but when Ryan's computer came back up, it came up to a presentation of the project - which he didn’t even have on his desktop computer. This seems to be tied to the second odd thing, which is that the corporate presentation has been changed - made 'sexier' than the original one they had. No one owns-up to changing it; then it becomes moot as the project goes down the drain (as opposed to down the tubes where they wanted it to go!). But there's another mini-brown-out, and the next morning as Ryan drives to work and tries to play some music on his iPhone, he keeps getting music from the game, which he didn’t think he had on his phone! Curiouser and curiouser....

It’s worth noting that Ryan has some history - a troubled affair with a co-worker named Michelle (who is another member of Horseshoe's senior management), which still haunts him, her, and his boss Eric. His friend Leon, another senior employee at Horseshoe is aware of his affair (everyone is!) and also has designs on Michelle. His live-in companion, Sarah is another one who knows. She's nudging him gently for more commitment and she has...leverage. She's just been given a big promotion, and with her new job came more bucks, she offers Ryan a chance to quit his long-hours, and the stressful and demanding job, so he can spend his time working on his novel instead. He already has fifty thousand words down. Why he needs significantly more time on it is a bit of a mystery, but again this makes this novel seem much more autobiographical, doesn't it? Ryan is a game developer writing a novel, Dansky is a game developer who has published a novel.

Ryan is a moron if he doesn’t take up Sarah's offer both for more commitment and for writing. Hell if he doesn’t want to take her up on it, I will! lol! I’d love an opportunity like that. Why Ryan was even questioning this chance is a question in itself (and causes me to question his questionable judgment!), but my worst feeling at that point was that he wouldn’t be smart enough to commit and he would end up losing Sarah. He's an idiot. Girls like Sarah are rare and to be treasured, but it’s his life to ruin, right?! Maybe it won’t pan out like that.

On the down side - the very minor downside - I found it odd that in a cutting-edge game development company, they’re using a whiteboard instead of teleconferencing and an eboard. It's even odder that his partner Sarah calls him on his desk phone rather than his cell. Doesn’t he have a cell? This is brushed under the carpet with a mention of limited minutes on the phone. Honestly? Dansky also seems a bit amateurish in, at one point, specifying that Ryan's desktop computer has a 36" flat screen monitor. This is 2013 (in the novel world). Was anyone outside of third world countries still using cathode ray tubes as monitors?! This is also a cutting-edge game development business. Why wouldn’t they have 36" flat screens? But that’s not a killer, so other than it arresting my attention for a second it didn’t detract from the story.

What I did find rather more odd was that there is some seriously weird formatting in this printed novel starting on pages 51 - 53. There wasn't any before that. It appeared in the form of excessive blank vertical spacing between one character's comment and another character's reaction to it. It’s the kind of space you leave in a novel when you're switching scenes and don’t want to start a new chapter for it, or when you want to indicate that some amount of time has passed between one event and another, except that in this case, no scene was switched and no time had passed, so I can only ascribe it to bad editing or bad formatting. What it actually looks like is that the text was hard-formatted for one book format and then got printed in another without being corrected, so the pagination is off. It’s noticeable and a bit distracting, but it's not a killer.

When Ryan learns that one of the engineers is still working on the Blue Lightning project (I guess it never crosses their mind to archive the files and password-protect them so only senior staff can get in there!) and slacking off his day job, Leon, his lead engineering friend, sets up web cams in the place where Terry, the offending engineer works, and the two of them, along with Michelle, spy on him via the cams. They see Blue Lightning actually come out of the computer just like the novel's cover illustration shows. The funniest thing about this part is the web cams. They get destroyed, and Leon whines about the cost, but these are nothing more than cheap-ass low-res webcams which cost next to nothing. But now the Djin is out of the bottle and there's no tonic for it!

I don’t know if Dansky fully intended Ryan to be the complete jerk and loser that he is, or if he doesn't know how to write a character who merits sympathy, but I don’t like the guy at all (Ryan, not Dansky!). He's certainly the team leader in bad decision-making, and the star supervisor of stupid. He has a bit of a blow-up with Sarah, who is the most awesome character in this entire novel. She is only trying to prevent this jerk from self-destructing, but rather than wise-up, Ryan ends-up betraying Sarah and sleeping with Michelle one drunken evening - quite literally sleeping as well as the other thing. Sarah is ignorant of his behavior, and she's heart-rendingly conciliatory when they get together later the next afternoon. She thinks he fell asleep at the office again, and slept there overnight instead of in Michelle's bed. Why either Sarah or Michelle would want anything to do with this self-centered loser is a mystery because he doesn’t seem to have a damned thing to recommend him, and he's screwing both of them in every possible way. I guess some women have too much decency (or shamelessness in Michelle's case) and nowhere near enough skepticism, because the sad thing is that this kind of thing actually happens in real life, too!

The problem with all this is that this soap opera, along with the day-to-day details of the computer game-designing business, are really overshadowing the ghost in the machine story. Why? Did Dansky intend to write a soap opera with some sci-fi thrown in or did he just lose his focus? Does he not know why people might take a look at this novel? I have to ask because it doesn't read to me like the kind of novel which game players would be interested in - they're too busy playing games! And it's a bit too procedural and technical for the casual reader, although sci-fi enthusiasts might pick it up, but then they, too, are likely to be disappointed by the soap-opera aspects of it! It seems like a comic-book format might have suited this story better.

I don’t know. I've liked the story, and I've followed it without bitching too much as I read, but the novel loses a lot of credibility with me at this point because this phenomenon that they've witnessed is completely outside the box (literally!), and yet none of the three people who have now newly learned of it seem to be at all amazed, intrigued, freaked-out, or curious about it! They simply continue on with their petty social interactions as though nothing bizarre has happened. Not a single one of them immediately confronts the engineer who seems to be most directly involved with bringing Blue Lightning literally to life. Can you say, "Not credible"? Given how dumb Ryan and Michelle are, this actually isn’t surprising, but I would have expected an entirely different pattern of behavior from Leon. Eventually, four of the slackers involved in resurrecting Blue Lightning do get fired, but not the ring-leader, because they need him for the project! What?!

In conclusion, Vaporware was entertaining to me, but the ending was a disappointment. I guess it was in keeping with way this story was told, but it was a bit bizarre to say the least; however, since Ryan got exactly what he deserved, I guess I won't complain too much about that, and I'll rate this as a worthy read!


Saturday, January 11, 2014

Swordbird by Nancy Yi Fan





Title: Swordbird
Author: Nancy Yi Fan
Publisher: Harper Trophy
Rating: WORTHY!

After reading Flavia Bujor's The Prophecy of the Stones how could I ignore another one written a really youthful writer? Swordbird is written by a girl who was ten or eleven when she began it (stories of her age - even her own - vary!), but it's arguably written technically better than is the 'prophecy' novel. It's barely more than 200 pages long and it's pretty much double-spaced, so it's a fast and easy read. This is the middle novel in a trilogy, the first volume of which was written subsequently to Swordbird, but takes place earlier.

Set in a forest where birds are as sentient as we are, and have a society organized like that of primitive humans living in tribes by species, this novel focuses on a war between the cardinals and the blue jays, which has been fomented by the evil hawk, who is kidnapping birds and forcing them to build a fortress for him. The hawk wants to live forever and preys on other birds, vampire like, in pursuit of his desire.

Clearly in a novel of this nature, some things ring true and others do not (birds don't sweat, for example, and Corvidae such as ravens are far from dumb), but you either have to decide to go with the flow or reject it. An author can sway that decision with poor writing, or a lack of realism within the context of their story, and Fan did not fail me in either regard, so I had no trouble starting it and getting into it. I think the writing is done well. How much of this is Fan and how much is her editor is an unanswered question, but the novel is descriptive and engaging, and it's quite inventive in many regards, such as when Fan changes our common words such as 'no one' and 'someone' into 'nobird' and 'somebird' and uses the phrase, 'ladies and gentlebirds'!

The story features strong characters who are unafraid to take up challenges, to sacrifice, and even to die for their cause (Fan doesn't shy away from the sad and tragic, including dying), but at the same time sadly limited to one strong female character. Nonetheless, she is a crucial agent in winning the battle against the Hawk, bringing in a distant tribe of robins to help out the cardinals and blue jays (which have finally realized that they've been duped by the hawk). They cease fighting their local battles, and unite against the evil of tyranny. Bringing the robins on-board is important because they have access to the vital gem which can summon Swordbird, and it's through his agency that they achieve victory over the hawk and finally bring the longed-for peace to the forest.

I have to say I have issues with stories which talk about the value of peace, but that peace can only be won through violence and war! Given Fan's starting premise, it seems to me that it's a betrayal of what she claims she's aiming for, and it is also a bit of a betrayal that these birds cannot achieve this themselves, but have to rely on the magical god Swordbird to give them what they need. Having said that, I'm going to stand by this novel because it's fun, inventive, well done, and represents a really neat achievement for one so young. This is a worthy read!


Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Roomies by Sara Zarr & Tara Altebrando





Title: Roomies
Author: Sara Zarr & Tara Altebrando
Publisher: Little Brown
Rating: WARTY

I can see why the publishers wouldn’t want a reviewer like me to get hold of a novel like this. We're treated in much the same way as character Elizabeth was by boyfriend Alex: betrayed, cheated on and like Elizabeth, screwed!

Unsurprisingly, given that it’s written by two people, this is a bit like an epistolary novel with alternating chapters taken up (in first person PoV I'm sorry to say) by two girls who are newly graduated from high-school, and planning upon attending Berkley University in San Francisco. How autobiographical it is, is unknown! There begins an exchange of emails between them since they’re destined to be room mates, but their respective chapters (fortunately for me!) do not consist solely of emails.

For one of them (Lauren), the move to university is like staying home (even though she's going to be in the dorms). because she will be only 25 miles away from where she grew up. For the other (Elizabeth - whose dad is gay, BTW), it’s a cross-continental escape from her rather so-so life in New Jersey. One of them wants to pursue something in science (Lauren), the other in landscaping (Elizabeth, the one with the gay dad). Kudos to the authors for stepping outside the standard comfort zone on that one. One of the girls is relatively well-off (gay-dad Elizabeth), the other is relatively poor and scraping by (Lauren). One of them is an only child (Elizabeth), the other from a large family (Lauren). One is living with a single parent (Elizabeth - the other absentee parent is gay, he's her dad), the other not (Lauren). In short, they’re artificially set-up to be as different as possible and thereby generate maximum conflict potential. Can anyone say cliché‎?! This is about as staged and artificial as you can get. I did mention that Elizabeth's dad is gay, didn't I?

The one in San Fran, from the large family (Lauren), understandably wanted her own dorm, but as a first year she was obviously deluding herself - yet later, the impossible to come-by single dorm is magically available. Conflict much? Lauren sees an academic email notifying her of the fact that she's to share with another girl at about the same time as she sees an overly perky email from the very girl with whom she'll be sharing. The university introduced them early so they could get to know each other a bit before they find themselves living together. Lauren replies rather tersely, and a slightly precarious and somewhat wobbly dynamic between them begins. Slowly it approaches an even keel as they learn to filter out their mood of the moment from the need to work towards a solid footing for their next year together.

This novel was first published in very late 2013, not in 2003 so it's interesting that the writing style tells us far more about the age, perspective, and higher education experiences of the authors of this novel (Sara & Tara) than it ever does about the purported teen authors (Elizabeth and Lauren). I found that quite revealing about how uninventive the authors are.

Elizabeth Logan is nicknamed EB. Why? No explanation. Lauren thinks of her as Ebb - like the initials for Elizabeth Barrett Browning. I don't know if Ebb, like in ebb and flow, or the poet is meant to convey anything. I suspect not, which is probably a good thing. I mean, who would want to extol a writer who named her son Pen?! Whatever name she goes by, Elizabeth seems to be the shallowest of shallow. At one point she expresses dismay about how she ever got together with her boyfriend and the only two issues she raises then are that he liked two sitcoms which she did not, and he always wore a baseball cap. Honestly? That was it? How pathetic can you get? Yeah, she also has an issue where he wants sex and she doesn’t, but which woman doesn't have that issue? Which guy doesn’t?!

Lauren and Elizabeth seem to comport themselves more like fourteen-year-olds than eighteen, with their "girlish" boy talk about kissing and "doing it". Not that either of them is doing it at that point. Elizabeth considers herself to be a "slut" for kissing a guy more than once for goodness sakes - and she's the one who thinks her mother needs a therapist? Are you kidding me? I sincerely hope our eighteen-year-old women aren’t like these two, especially not those who are educated well-enough to be university-bound.

The behavior of these two young too-young girls is especially weird given that they're quite literally strangers who know next-to-nothing about each other. Their becoming "insta-friends" has a solid ring of falsehood about it which really strains credibility and suspension of disbelief. Indeed, false as it is, the love affair between the two of them has far more going for it than does either one's trashy YA trope affair with a boy. Another weird thing is that neither of them is showing any anticipation or excitement about the fact that a whole new life is opening up for them chock-full of great experiences, new people, and a wonderful education where they will get to choose the things they study. Seriously, what woman worth knowing is that blinkered in her outlook?

Instead of reveling in this upcoming adventure, as any self-respecting teen ought to be (realistically speaking), they're maudlin and whiny about their supposedly sad lives, obsessing over boys for whom they've had thoroughly insufficient time to develop real feelings (Elizabeth much less so than Lauren) and they're also wallowing in meaningless trivia. This really undermines any potential power this novel might have had.

Another weird thing (among many!) is their emailing and texting practices. They behave like fourteen-year-olds when it comes to their behavior vis-à-vis boys, but they appear excessively mature in their emailing style: they use no abbreviations or texting-type shortcuts. How weird is that? Despite some emails coming from Lauren and others from Elizabeth (e-Lizabeth and i-Lauren?! LoL), their emails are completely interchangeable in style. The same author could have written them all (and maybe she did!). They even employ the same style, using capitalization for emphasis instead of italicizing the words or at least putting an _underscore_ before and aft, or an *asterisk*. When Elizabeth mentions to Lauren that her father wrote her a letter (as opposed to an email) when he left, she talks about it like she's forty years old and this happened thirty years ago, when in fact it happened roughly a decade ago. Excuse me but there were emails throughout both their lives; it’s not like either of them grew up in an era where the primary means of written communication was snail-mail. But maybe the authors did.

I guess I should say a word or two about their respective dating situations (not the authors, the characters!). Lauren's dating situation is, well, none. She's apparently never had a real date (at eighteen! In San Francisco! If you can believe that!). Her tedious whine is that she never has time for anything, which means she's lying to herself, and her problem isn’t lack of time, but really lousy time-management skills (which she needs to address with diligence before she ever enters serious academia). She's on summer vacation for goodness sakes! Yes, she has two jobs, but from her narrative, both of these combined occupy minimal time.

The one guy she hangs out with (though only at work to begin with) is named Keyon, and he's the black son of her black employer at the deli where she works lunch times. Oh, and he's black. She thinks he's kinda hot (and black), but nothing happens until she has her own mini-pity-party at a larger party she attends, and he's there at her side. Did I mention he's black? His comforting her leads to a kiss and suddenly it’s instadore (and he's black). Not insta-love, but instadore (or more likely, instafatuation?), since it cannot be love, not even remotely, not even if he's black. I did mention that he's black, right? Why YA authors, especially female YA authors cannot ever seem to convey this important distinction (love v. infatuation) to their young and potentially impressionable readership is as much an abuse of said readership as it is a mystery to discerning readers. They seem to have no problem telling a story in black and white....

Elizabeth has been dating Alex for six months, but is going off him. He's pressuring her for sex which she doesn’t want to give not even after six months because he likes two sitcoms that she hates and he wears a baseball cap. There can be no doubt that these are good, solid, valid reasons for denying nookie are the only ones a modern girl needs. Yet she's contemplating putting out for a guy she just met and knows nothing about, and she wants to nookie his noodle for no other reason than that he replaced her tank-top strap when it fell down her arm. Seriously? Does she not have enough smarts to graspeth that short-term chivalry to get some long-term bootie is ye oldest trick in ye book? The most dangerous guys are the ones who put their dates/wives on a pedestal whilst simultaneously abusing them either physically or mentally. Elizabeth met Mark through her part time landscaping job, although there was much more ladscaping than landscaping going on that day. And of course, Mark is also instafatuation.

Once I'd made up my mind about this novel, I checked out some other reviews to see if I'd missed something important (no, I hadn't!), and I noted that some reviewers have speculated over which author wrote which character, and whether they each went into character and wrote the novel as their character alter ego. I see no point in such speculation even though there are things we can learn from the author bios. Zarr was raised in San Fran, and Altebrando lives in NYC, so it’s tempting to think they each wrote the character who was closest to home, but we also read that Zarr moved to Salt Lake City, home of the bizarre Mormon religion, so it’s tempting to think she may have written the sexually-troubled Elizabeth with the gay dad (I did mention he was gay, right?). See what I mean?! No point in speculation. I suspect that they each wrote parts of both characters.

I found it amusing that Elizabeth doesn’t dig into Lauren's online presence because she considers looking at someone's Facebook page is the equivalent of stalking! Not that Lauren has an online presence, but her best friend does. That's how sad Elizabeth is. The saddest thing about Lauren's family is that they're apparently too ignorant (or just too stupid) to get vaccinated against the flu. People who fail to vaccinate their kids are guilty of child abuse, in my opinion. I also find it particularly odd that this flu strikes in July, but hell, it's that kind of a novel.

The saddest thing about Elizabeth's relationship with Mark is that one of the highlights they think they should pack into their limited time together is to have a fight! I am not making this up. Their list is so childish as to be nauseating. Or maybe the saddest thing about her is that she looks up Lauren's friend Zoe on Facebook and discovers that Zoe is white so she assumes Lauren is, too (and her boyfriend is black. Did I mention that yet?). Seriously, I do not get the obsession these authors have with color and sexual orientation in this novel - it’s not like variation in skin is completely natural or anything... (and yes, Caucasians are a minority, so deal with it!), or that being gay is merely one point on the sliding scale from totally feminine to totally masculine or anything! Zarr and Altebrando have to highlight it in - yes! - color, underline it, and spell it out in block caps with a snazzy font. Why? Are they making up for the sins of their own youth? Who knows?

Lauren thinks black babies are cuter than white babies. I don’t know if that assertion is more condescending than racist or the other way around, but it seems revealing that Lauren Cole is the girl whom the authors have dating the black guy. Really?! C'mon, babies are cute, period (except when it comes to crying, spitting-up, and diapers, of course, then they're universally nasty). I don’t see how you can categorize babies by color, like they're socks or something, but Sara and Tara evidently have no problem with that method.

The ending of the novel was perfect, and not just because it brought this sorry attempt at drama to a close. It was just horrible that everything leading up to that ending was so below par. It would seem obvious from that ending that Zarr and Altebrando are planning on a sequel to this, but I will not be on-board for any such novel, or any subsequent milking of this honestly juvenile effort. This novel is WARTY!


Tuesday, January 7, 2014

The Undiscovered Goddess by Michelle Colston





Title: The Undiscovered Goddess
Author: Michelle Colston
Publisher: Michelle Colston
Rating: WARTY


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

I found this novel rather disturbingly addictive when I began it, but as I continued to read it, I found myself fuming at Holly's inertia and vacuity, and at her brain-washed self-loathing induced by hideous societal pressures on women. I seriously hoped, as I got deeper and deeper into it, that Colston would pull something worthy out of this smoldering fire, otherwise, I decided, I would be really pissed at her and depressed about Holly. The worst thing that could happen with this novel, I decided, was that Colston would pull an Ephron and trivialize everything with a pat, middle-class, suburban ending. She didn't do that, but she didn't wise-up Holly, either. Holly was, at the end, even more stupid and shallow than she had been at the begining.

I'm all for discovering goddesses (although my definition of goddess differs significantly, I suspect, from that of most people), so this title intrigued me, and the blurb (which probably lied through its eye-teeth as you know they do) sounded intriguing, sucker that I am, so I took it up. I found Colston's writing style comfortable and easy to get into, although after only one page I had grave doubts about how goddess-like the main character is, or alternatively, what must be wrought upon her in the process of such a discovery, but overall, I liked the writing style even as I railed at a significant number of the things in it. Unfortunately, even this palled and became boring before I had got three-quarters into this. Holly just isn't an interesting person; she never became anyone I cared about or grew interested in knowing.

In general, in reading, it's really important to keep in mind that the characters in a novel are not the author of the novel (although that can happen), and it can be even harder to separate author from character when a novel is written in first person, so I have to fully disclose here that I had the distinct (if possibly erroneous) impression that this is much more of an autobiographical work than your typical first person perspective novel can tend to be. By the completion of the novel, Colston had done nothing to change my views whether the impression I have is erroneous or not.

The protagonist, who is initially anonymous, categorizes herself as "a wife and mother of three" which I found disturbing, especially since she seems to spend her entire time shuttling kids around and doing (or at least planning) household chores. Since she starts out as a stay-at-home wife who performs 1950's style 'wifely duties' who has a problem with alcohol, and who reads laughably shallow female abuse (read: fashion) magazines, there would seem to be ample room for a make-over of a significantly richer hue than I feared might be under consideration here! Unfortuantely, she does nto change in any of these regards. At the end, she is still pretty much the same as when she began, the major change being that she spoils herself more rotten by the end than she did at the beginning, but hey, she spoils herself in different ways so that's progress, right?!

In view of how absurdly early magazines are put out (the "January" issue descending upon us in November), I found it somewhat of a stretch that she's only getting down to reading the January Cosmo actually in January. It's possible, I suppose, but she describes it as a "brand new" edition, which is definitely not a bedfellow of reality where magazines are concerned! I sincerely hope women like this one are not the majority, but this is the impression we’re given - that your typical mid-thirties housewife (not my description!) has nothing more substantial in her head than reading horoscopes and completing shallow quizzes in a magazine pregnant with ads telling women how fat, ugly, and shabbily dressed they are, how bad their skin is ("I never use soap on my face!"), and how thoroughly "trailer-park" their home is unless they rigidly and religiously follow the advice being dispensed therein! Having said that, there is significant evidence to suggest that a disturbingly high proportion of women are raised to see themselves that way even as, paradoxically, they are not fundamentally like that. This obviously needs to be fixed, and if Colston has a solution, then she definitely deserves to be heard!

A problem hit me, curiously enough, on page 13, when someone else hijacked this novel. I was unceremoniously assaulted by someone called Devi Phoenix (honestly? I'm surprised Colston didn’t add a string of academic initials after the name!) the author of yet another pointless self-help work of fiction who comes off like an airhead (and not in a good way) and then she, in turn, is hijacked by "Holly", who is a complete cookie-cutter version of the original main character. This was confusing to me since there was nothing in the opening section to identify who the heck the introductory character was. I'd honestly wondered if it was supposed to be Michelle Colston herself, and Devi and Holly were two other people, but it took only a few pages to get that we'd reverted back to the initial character who turned out to be named Holly. Ooookay! A bit confusing, but nothing tragic.

Devi, curiously, has a bad habit of saying "BLESSED BE" (yes, in block caps), just as Colston/Holly has a habit of saying, Namaste, which is a Hindi phrase meaning roughly, "I adore you in a non sexual way"! Thirty-Four-year-old Holly has three children, is a 1950's style mom, has a serious drinking problem, and a husband who abandons his family for business reasons. She's going through a mid-life crisis and is, after a series of failures in self-help endeavors, committed for unexplained reasons, to reading and following Devi's advice on how to raise a Phoenix from ashes. I was not convinced that this would suffice given that Holly has some serious and highly clichéd issues - the kinds of issue which give me all the reason I need to avoid TV sitcoms like the ten fictional divine plagues visited on the Egyptians.

Holly starts keeping a journal which is this novel. I wonder if it was actually Colston's journal which she figured she could make a few bucks from if she "fictionalized" it, changing a name or an event here and there? This is supposed to be her private, personal journal, yet she's frequently 'bleeping out' her cussing! That defeated my suspension of disbelief more than once. It's weird because on p142, she declares that "fuck" happens to be one of her favorite words yet she's censoring it in her private journal, including on the very page where she claims it's a favorite!? This is not smart writing.

It’s funny because the entry for May 8th (p24), discussing a conversation she had with her husband while she was drunk, actually says "...did he not talk me out it?" - not "...did he not talk me out of it?"! Maybe the book editor was drunk? It would seem so, because at one point Holly talks about not being able to make something because she's out of ingredients and the weather is so bad that she can’t go out (schools are closed, etc), yet two days later, without having gone out in the intervening period, she's making pancakes and baking fudge cake! Somebody lied! I sincerely hope Holly's kids don't get food poisoning from eating the raw eggs in the cake batter, but that's another issue….

Holly both understands (so it would seem) that she has serious problems yet she continues, in the same breath (or same sentence, since she's summarizing in writing), to describe her husband as a good provider (almost in so many words!) upon whom she depends. So she simultaneously degrades herself to dependent status and fails to achieve the realization that her own husband fails to pay her anywhere near enough attention (as his blindness to her 'binge and purge era' testifies quite adequately). After all this, she rather cluelessly questions herself as to why she's not happy when she has "it all" (including "a nice car")!

I think Holly still has a lot to learn about life, including who she is and what she needs, but I guess that's what this crisis is all about! At least she understands how shallow Shawn is when he mindlessly blabbers how perfect she is, yet she's never considered talking about it with him and now, of course, his shallow 'compliments' are simply not enough for her. These thoughts are underlined dramatically when she sits down on May 16th to write a sad list of what she dreams of having, and the first two items on her list are "the perfect body" (in block caps - and not "a" perfect body but "the" perfect body - like there's only one and if she has it, then no other woman can!), and owning an immaculate wardrobe.

Now there's absolutely nothing wrong, and indeed everything right with liking who you are and enjoying your clothes (as long as you're realistic about it!), but if who you should be, what kind of bod you should have, and what you should wear are (however indirectly) defined by men, then what in hell are you thinking of‽ How can you be who you are when your full-time occupation is being someone else's idea of who they think you need to be? Holly's list is amusing in its contradictions, too. She wants to be famous, but she also 'vants to be alone'! Good luck vith that! Her desire for traveling the world, I can get with, but it’s about he only thing on her list which I would have included had I made such a list; then I appear to be a lot happier with myself than Holly is. BTW, I’d love to know how she achieved the impossible by healing diaper rash with homeopathic "remedies"! LoL!

I noted down a few impressions of Holly as I read:

  • Holly must have the most irregular periods ever judged by her record of them in her journal.
  • Her 'fear' journal is so 'all over the place' that it's scary! I don’t see how she resolves anything.
  • Holly is something of a scatter brain.
  • Holly colors her hair. It's yet another example of how dissatisfied she is with herself, yet it's one of which she seems oblivious.
  • Holly places a rather racist emphasis on "BLUE eyes" (block caps hers) in her husband.
  • Holly has a "my room" to which she heads for sanctuary? Does she mean the bedroom? Why does she see it as her room? Does she not routinely sleep with Shawn?
  • Holly has a "my office" (for what?)
  • Holly is Irish Italian. Seriously? Could she be any more generic?
  • Holly's to-do list consists of eight line items, nearly every one of which is a chore. Not that she does them all, but she certainly does more than one.
  • Shawn's to do list is 'mow the lawn' and he's done.
  • Holly really doesn't seem to interact with Shawn or to do anything, or to go anywhere with him. Is he the problem? Really - is he preventing her from being her goddess, or is it all DIY?

There was one annoying journal entry where we learn (and in great detail) how much Holly hates the beach. She knew she would hate the beach. She hates to go to the beach. See Holly hate the beach. Hate. Hate. Hate. She gets to the beach and...she hates it. My conclusion from this is that she's not only scatter-brained, she's also clueless. She could have stayed home! She could have had the very time to herself that she claims she craves, and let Shawn deal with the kids for a day doing stuff which they all appear to love. What is wrong with her? Will she ever learn?!

And again with Shawn neglecting her in this regard! He could have suggested she stay home and take some self-time, but he insists that she come along. Why is she "carrying a thrashing toddler" and not Shawn? What’s he carrying other than self-satisfaction and a lack of respect for his partner? And why does she have to apologize to him for his complete lack of empathy for how his wife is feeling and what she's going through? Shortly after this, Holly is sitting at home, drinking beer "waiting for Shawn" (who's out mowing the lawn). What's up with that? What, exactly, is she waiting for? I remember thinking at that point that if Holly got off her waiting ass and mowed the lawn, that might take care of a pound or two for her right there. But they probably have a rider mower (which of course, only guys can ever use)….

Holly is most definitely the Beast of Burden in this marriage. Shawn isn't up making lunches and breakfasts for the kids, Holly is. Why does she see nothing wrong in this? Hey, did you know that the body works in 21 day "repair" cycles? No, I didn’t either. Nor do I believe it. Or maybe that's why Holly's periods are out of whack? I guess Holly didn’t reach the part of her self-help which asks if her partner is a dead weight! Instead, she affirms her commitment to him when one of her friends announces that she's separating from hers. This felt like some kind of con-trick to me - misdirect the mark and you get…Leverage! The distance from her husband in this story so far - they way she writes about him (or more revealingly, what she doesn’t write) reminds me of the words from REM's song, Losing My Religion "...the lengths that I will go to, the distance in your eyes...every whisper of every waking hour I'm choosing my confessions...".

Another tragically ignored issue here is still that Holly doesn't have a life. Her entire "life" is a function of the needs of others. She does nothing for herself. She has no job. She has no interests. She never reads (unless it’s psychically self-destructive glossy women's magazines - the ones which typically print the title of the magazine right over the part of the cover model's head where her brain ought to be - you know, above the part where her pores have been surgically removed?). Holly has no interests outside the home except for going on drunken binges with some girlfriends who are apparently doing worse in life than Holly herself is.

There's a third issue here which is unexplored, and which might be the most important of all. No one in the right mind would deny Holly the right to chose her path in life and do the things she feels she needs to do, but Holly isn't operating in a vacuum here either. She's a crucial and integral part of a family, and yet she's embarking upon these self-determined and rather destructive courses without discussing any of it with anyone in her family. This is really selfish of her. No, she can’t be expected to put her life on hold at the whim of others (although in many ways she's already done that), nor, as an adult, should she need to get permission to indulge herself in things which are important to her, but neither does she have the right to inflict suffering on her family on what’s really nothing more than whim and caprice, especially not with no sort of discussion at all with her husband. Are they partners or what? This is a real problem which is left unexplored in this novel. Holly isn’t guiltless here and she comes off looking rather selfish to boot.

But there are worse problems with these bullshit self-help books. They're pretty much always written by people who have no clue about biology or evolution. They're typically written by evangelicals who are self-deluded into thinking they’ve had some sort of personal epiphany which was granted to them and no one else, and they're convinced that their narrow, blinkered view of life can change the world. They also love to trail academic initials after their name. If you look at a book written by a honest-to-goodness doctor or scientist or some such, you never see them lard-up their name space with initials on the cover. Did Stephen Gould, Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, or Stephen Hawking ever trail initials after their name in any of the books they wrote? No. That's how you tell if the writer is honest or is merely a pretentious bullshit artist and poseur who's out to make a fast buck from a fast and loose book.

Yes, granted that the fictional Devi didn’t have initials after her name either, but she's committing another sin: she's presenting fiction as fact with unsupported and undocumented claims about cycles and organics. I'm not saying there isn’t a point in there; we could all lead healthier and more active lives than we do, but the one thing people who write like this persistently and advisedly avoid discussing is that people are healthier and live longer these days than ever before. Our primitive ancestors - the very ones who lived the life these neo-Neanderthals seek to drag us back into, lived short and brutal lives. Their children died by the score. Keep that in mind when planning any major lifestyle change. Having said that, then yes, eating healthier and exercising more is a good thing (as long as you don’t take it to extremes, and as long as you match it to your physical condition and age), but there's nothing evil in some occasional slacking on chores and aims, or in once-in-a-while cheating on your diet plan. The one unavoidable fact is that life is way too short to spend one minute of it being miserable.

Holly's cleansing was as amusing as it was absurd. I weep for women who are put through this by the shysters of this world, and all it would take to fix this is a good science education - the very thing we're screwing our kids out of as annual comparisons of student performance between the US and the rest of the world confirm year after year. Quite clearly the "success" of her cleanse was in that she's now done with it. But neither she nor the author of her travails can actually demonstrate that anything was cleansed - that the condition of her large intestine is any cleaner or healthier now than it was beforehand. It’s all in the head. The misery is over and it's no surprise that she feels so damned good! Duhh! Her yoga seems to server better, but even whilst she's admiring the changes she's wrought, she's still putting on "anti-aging" cream and having artificial extensions added to her eye lashes. Her inner goddess is no doubt dying of neglect at this point, starved of self-love, but maybe that bottle of champagne in mid week and drunk during the day will help? Seriously? Champagne on Tuesday morning? There will be more on her extravagances later!

It seems increasingly that Holly's problem is far less about mind than it is about body, and all of her self-image problems are really those imposed upon her by men: ass too large, breasts too small. Does that sound familiar? She pretty much abandons her budding self-sculpture in favor of once more sitting on her ass doing nothing while someone else works on her at a trip to a day spa. What a betrayal! She plans on spoiling herself rotten (if this alternate torture is your idea of being spoiled, that is) starting with a seaweed wrap (which used to be a food, now it’s a body adornment, apparently). There's absolutely no evidence that this does anything to remove 'toxins', but more to the point, didn’t she ought to be free of 'toxins' after all the 'cleansings' she's done?! Thanks, Holly, for admitting to us, if not to yourself, that those cleansings were a complete waste of time and money, and constituted nothing but a cruel and unusual punishment to yourself and your family.

A face peel is also on the agenda, which is cause for a face palm in my book. Yes, it’s an uncomfortable thought, but whenever you look at another human being, you’re looking at a dead person in the respect that the entire outer layer of skin is dead tissue! Scary thought huh: everyone's a zombie! But that skin is there for a reason as any student of evolution (which Holly definitely is not) will tell you, and if you peel it off, you're exposing the very tender skin underneath to all kinds of assault from, well, 'toxins' in the environment LOL! You're also exposing it to some serious UV irradiation from the sun. Besides, the entire 'fresh" outer layer of your skin that you just exposed will die and replace what you just peeled off. It’s a cycle, so you just wasted your money, Holly.

Hell, if you're so wealthy that you can toss money down drains, then go for it, but please do keep in mind that it isn't the toxic chemicals, or massage, or hot stones, or seaweed that's relaxing you, and making you feel better - it’s the lying around whilst someone fusses over you and makes you feel special that's doing the trick - something her partner and herself ought to be taking turns at doing for each other if he wasn't so preoccupied with his almost permanently away from home job, and she wasn't so self-absorbed twenty-four-seven. So once again we’re back to the poor quality of Holly's relationship with her husband! That's the one thing she (with very very few exceptions) is really making zero effort over. But this is before she mindlessly blabbers on about how important it is to work at a relationship, so maybe she gets it eventually? Nah!

Holly would never make a doctor or a nurse. When her son complains of stiffness in his elbow, it never once enters her head that he has a potential infection - she puts it down to "growing pains" and dismisses it without even offering so much as something to rub on it, or an aspirin, or even a hug. I know it's awful to coddle children excessively, but there are legitimate complaints which they get from time to time and she failed here. Worse, she then translates her pat non-diagnosis into fodder for her journal. I really started not liking her at this point. I’d already been turned off her for her clueless addiction to the fatuous non-science nonsense of homeopathy and to horoscopes (how many times does she claim she's a Libra?), but I never really and honestly disliked her until then. It’s all about her, which is the whole point of this novel, sure, but you know, a novel can be about someone without that person coming-off as self-centered, selfish and even stupid!

Holly needs seriously to read The Vagina Monologues or something along those lines; maybe then she wouldn’t use her remarkable and fascinating primary reproductive organ as the same sort of insult into which men turn it when using a well-known four-letter expletive in a derogatory way about women. The problem is that Holly is being equally clueless when she describes it as her "goddess center"! It’s probably a fact that women have an easier time discussing bowel functions than they do talking about, and actually looking at and appreciating, their vulva and vagina. Holly is a classic exemplar of this. She offered way TMI when discussing her urgent need to visit the bathroom when she was doing her three week cleansing, and she was hilarious when she described a person in front of her farting during her "hot yoga" (no, that's not what you think), but here, when it comes to something important, pleasant, even joyous, and rather interesting for a variety of reasons, she's all embarrassed and clams up (if I can get away with a common term which seems rather inappropriate in this context!)

It’s really sad that the fictional Holly is way too representative of way too many women. I appreciated that Colston included this section, and it actually did a lot to win this novel back into my favor after I started feeling a bit blah about it earlier, but unfortunately this good will wasn't to last.

Lindy, the yoga instructor is a wacko as the other snake oil sales women in this novel. She claims that cells hold memories which is pure, patent, undiluted, unadorned, unadulterated bullshit, and Holly of course, being who she is, swallows it whole. Yes, your cells hold DNA which can be considered 'memory' of a kind, but no, the overwhelming majority of your cells are not neurons so no, they don’t hold memories as we typically envision memories, the don't hold grudges, they don’t remember pain and suffering. But nonetheless, Holly buys this bullshit and cries all the way home thinking that suffering is her friend. In this, Colston undid all of the goodwill I had harbored for her too-hastily glossed over vagina non-monologue.

Holly's sole idea of "Goddess day" is to go blow a wad of money on products with which to pamper herself, so all I learned from this is that she's replaced one set of excesses (such as drinking an over-eating) with another set. It's all about money and this woman is spoiled rotten. How the hell would some poor working-class woman ever even begin to match what Holly takes for granted? At this point I had dropped this novel down on the scale to the level marked "DETESTATION" (yes in block caps). It's always all about Holly, which is really tedious after a while. But there is some unintentional humor in the irony of her behavior. Sometimes I wonder if Colston has written a parody here? If she had it would have been brilliant, but I fear that it's far more of an autobiography than ever it could be a parody. One big laugh was when self obsessed, looks-addicted, superficial and spoiled brat diva Holly has the gall to act in disbelief when her oldest son gets interested in a cheerleader! Honestly? Her measure in my eyes diminishes with every new page at this point, and it's about to really nose dive big time.

Well, I have read some sorry-ass reflections by Holly in this novel, but the truly saddest was on page 175. Note that this is Holly, who has never, ever, ever, EVER, EVER wanted for a dollar in this entire novel so far. Whatever she has selfishly wanted, she has gone right out and bought it without even considering asking Shawn if she can spend his money on it. She has never once hesitated. She has never once had to put something on lay-away or had to put off buying it until the next week or until the next month because of budgetary concerns. She has never once had to rent to buy a single thing. She wants a day at the spas? Call 'em up and book it for the next day, and give no thought to the cost. She wants a new guitar? Head off and spends $160 on one right there and then, and that's not including the gas to drive to a nearby town where they have a guitar shop. Guitar lessons? Go buy 'em, and spare no expense. She wants to drink champagne like it's mineral water? Go right ahead and forget all your vows on alcohol intake. She wants one product after another, she buys it. She wants designer clothes, she buys them. She wants to interrupt meditation by wondering if designer boots are on sale now it’s spring? Go for it! Never once has she thought a single thought about cost or selfishness. With that in mind, read this directly from page 175:

With a heavy heart, I thought about Africa and its many troubles. The disease, the poverty, the lack of water and sanitation, the kids who don’t get told they're loved every day. I'm no doctor or teacher. I don't know how build a school or give vaccinations. I don’t know how to design irrigation fields or harvest rice. I certainly don’t possess the spiritual savvy to tell a village who to worship or how. Nonetheless, I don't think you have to have a PhD when it comes to helping out. If I have no constructive skill to offer, I’d still love to go over there and give everyone I meet a high five.

I honestly lost count of how many shamefully clueless wrongs there are in that one paragraph, and I don’t know if Colston is really this utterly blind, unfeeling, and yes, stupid, or if this is some sort of snide commentary on how utterly blind, unfeeling, and stupid women like Holly are. Like I said, I kept wondering if I was missing a really good parody here, but it rang too true to autobiography to honestly feel like one - and having finished it, it proved to be no parody. Colston/Holly really is this clueless. Lets itemize a few issues here. Right after dissing the entire continent of Africa, she decides to scrap her "research project" and focus on having fun. I am not kidding you. Shallow much, Holly? "Kids who don’t get told they're loved every day"? And that only happens in Africa? She talks of Africa like it’s a country rather than a massive continent of hugely diverse peoples. Just how much of a train-wreck of racist, condescending, self-righteous bullshit can one women create?

She doesn't know how to build a school or give vaccinations? What, she can't learn or go volunteer as a pair of hands, and learn on the job? She doesn't possess the spiritual savvy to tell Africans who they should worship? Honestly? It's religion, for god's sake! It’s all made up by ancient dudes. What’s to know? And even if you did know, where the hell do you get off thinking that Africans need your input on that topic, you self-important bimbo? Hands that come open and ready to share the load will always achieve way-the-hell more than hands that pray tightly clasped together ever will. Yeah, give 'em all a high five, Holly, because that will fix everything and make all those poor African children feel so loved. I can't believe this paragraph. I have to go to the pharmacy and get some anti-nausea pills at this point so I can finish this novel and move on. This one paragraph may have succeeded in completely writing off this entire novel off for me. The only way Colston can save it now is to have Holly die horribly, or have her wake up from a coma.

As if that's not bad enough, Blind clueless Holly decides that the best way to deal with South America (which apparently only has one culture according to Holly's tunnel vision of the world), is to take up salsa dancing. I kid you not. Because when was it EVER about what she could do for someone else? never! It's always been about what she can do for herself. She "addresses" her ignorance of the cultural situation in Mexico by watching a soap on Telemundo which she doesn’t understand because it’s in Spanish. Eating an Indian curry (and getting diarrhea afterwards, because let's face it, turning into a an old trope is all that curry could ever be good for). Clearly spending money on feeding her face is going to have much more impact upon the world than sending that money to an Indian charity. That's her solution to the issues and political problems of the Indian continent which houses over a sixth of the world's population!

She "honors" Italy by pairing an Italian meal with a wine made from a grape originating in Croatia (Zinfandel)! I guess if she listen's to Pink Floyd's The Wall, it could probably take care of China, right? And so we'd have over a third of the world's population covered with just those two acts! She already wears a towel around her hair after a shower, so that has to have the Middle East covered, too, huh? A Popsicle now and then will take care of the Inuit. So we’re making some real progress now! Congratulations Holly. Despite her obvious wealth, Holly never does contribute anything to any charity or volunteer herself for anything that would help anyone but herself. I mean for goodness sakes, she could get books on the subject if she can't afford to go there or give to charities, or at least she could watch an educational show on TV, but now, her solution is a soap opera and really, that tells you everything you need to know about this shallow, unthinking woman.

This woman is so bizarrely bereft of any grasp of reality that she thinks nature - which has been described by others as 'red in tooth and claw' - is really much more like that depicted in a toddler's story book where all the animals get along and everyone is happy and contented. She believes there is no stress and that animals get what they need without asking. Honestly are there really people this stupid and if so how did they ever reach the age of 35? But then this is a woman who considers a Buffy the Vampire Slayer marathon to be "quality time".

Despite all her efforts towards fitness, when Holly decides to jog back from taking the kids to school, she can't handle it. Just how much training, exactly, has she done? Very little, it would seem. It's only five miles but it's sandy OMG! When she gets back home she complains that her legs are "less stable than a two-story Jell-O mold." What? her editor must have slept through this portion just like me. Someone needs to tell Holly (if it's supposed to be misspelled) or more likely Colston, that unless her legs were less stable than a Jell-O® mold which could tell only two tales, the word she was looking for has an e in it: 'storey'. She has the same problem with 'cut and dried' which she renders as 'cut and dry' which is close, but no cigar, even though that usage is indeed creeping into the language through people like Holly mangling the original term.

She goes on about how, in a storm, the branches of trees may thrash but the roots remain still. Clearly she wasn't in Austin a couple of months back when Onion Creek massively overflowed after torrential rain, and tore through a park wrenching up dozens of young Pecan trees. She clearly hasn’t thought anywhere near enough about Africa and its droughts - but hey, the dead roots remained in place, right? She hasn’t ever heard of a flood in Pakistan or forest fires in the US (but the roots stayed put even though the trees died, right?! She was clearly in a coma when the St Stephen's tsunami slaughtered a quarter million children, women, and men a few years back and tore up their world. Yes, sticking your head far enough into the sand that it deadens reality, and ignoring everything but the fluffy bunnies of life is the smartest way to go, and it's most definitely the lesson learned here!

On page 197 we get the most stupid question ever: is the glass half empty or is it half full? Well it depends on whether you're pouring something into it (in which case it’s half full) or whether you're drinking what you poured, in which case it’s half empty, dim wit! Duhh. But by all means, do go ahead and reduce people's psyches to dumb-ass metaphors if it makes you feel better about yourself.

BTW, there is no evidence that Einstein ever said "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used
when we created them" or its more rational variation: "Problems cannot be solved by the level of awareness that created them". This is a folk quote, but leave it to dumb-ass Holly to fail to actually comprehend even her own fake quote. She's trying to think of ways she can make an impact on a bigger scale than getting her face peeled, and she whines that she is the only one of her friends who recycles, and they bitch about each other in a bitchy way (because, let's face it, they're none of them nice women by Holly's own account), yet never once does Holly grasp the fact that right here is where she could make a difference: by persuading her friends to start recycling and asking them to persuade people they know in turn!

Instead of this, she resolves her global issues by deciding to be nice to a nasty-ass check girl. This is when idiot Holly has tun out of the house to get Gatorade for her sick kid who has stomach flu. Never mind that water is proven to work just fine for re-hydration, a fact which Holly ought to know from her exercising, let's give her stuff that by Holly's own admission has high fructose corn syrup in it! I guess Holly has no faith in those organic healthy foodstuffs after all. Way to go Holly. Now you have the entire globe single-handedly fixed, you can move on to the next clueless waste of time in your ridiculously shallow life. And if you say it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness, bring me the candle and I'll show you where you can light it up - assuming that location isn't as shallow as Holly Goincrediblylightly is.

This novel, which started out really rather interestingly despite some immediate issues, went so slowly and steadily downhill that I reached a point where I had to ask myself why in hell I was reading it, without really understanding how I'd ever let it go so far in the first place. So kudos to Colston for deluding me so successfully, but no, this novel is really boring after about the three-quarter mark, and where it isn't boring it's just plain stupid. But at least the amusement factor helps alleviate the boredom. For example, like when she asks "What does the word 'goddess' mean to you?" - well my answer to that is obvious: anyone who is decidedly not Holly! lol!

As for the first three-quarters, there are enough issues there to make it a dodgy prospect at best. Yes, there were parts I found endearing and entertaining, but ultimately it was never enough for me because i kept on hoping that this would go somewhere and it never did. Holly wasn't anywhere near enough to occupy my mind and get me interested. She was never enough to make me remember her or even want to! If I met Holly at a party I would be making excuses to get away from her pretty much as soon as she opened her mouth. In the final analysis, I really don't care two organic figs about Holly or her life or her lifestyle because there's nothing going on in her life that's merit-worthy. Really, nothing. As I mentioned before, it's all Holly, all the time, and in the most self-obsessed, selfish, clueless way imaginable. This woman is so delusional, so ignorant of reality, and so blinded to life that this whole exercise turns out to be a really good commercial for avoiding the very thing Holly (and by extension, Colston) is selling here! This novel is WARTY!


Monday, January 6, 2014

Paper Towns by John Green


Title: Paper Towns
Author: John Green
Publisher: Brilliance Audio
Rating: WARTY!

This audio CD was read competently by Dan John Miller.

This novel, unfortunately told from first-person PoV, could be a lot worse, but it was getting there. Miller's narration helps, and the fact that the novel was amusing in parts also helped. The story hinges (and I use that word advisedly) entirely upon spineless Quentin Jacobsen's infatuation with his next-door neighbor, Margo Roth Spiegelman, who turns out to be a complete jerk.

Quentin is in fatuation with Margo, who shows up at his bedroom window one night demanding that he drive her around in his mom's van (he has no car) because she's had her car keys confiscated by her predictable, unadventurous, but also feisty parents, and she has eleven critical things to do that night (so she deludedly believes). The entire repertoire of criticality is inextricably entangled in Margo's juvenile need for revenge against a two-timing boyfriend, and she drags Quentin in on it with her, selfish much-adolescent-about-nothing that she is.

This plan having been more-or-less successfully executed, Quentin finds his life starting to turn around, but even as it does, Margo has disappeared. This isn't the first time she's taken off, and she's always left an impossible-to-follow clue before showing up shortly afterwards of her own accord, no less irresponsible or full of self-importance. This time, it's been six days with no word at all from her, and when Quentin discovers a whole series of cryptic clues, since he has no life and no self-respect, he obsesses on following wherever they lead, in hopes of tracking down Margo, and he starts to slowly come to the conclusion that maybe Margo has taken the biggest trip of all. Or has she?

Disk 6 wouldn't play in the car, so I skipped to disk 7 which turned out to be fine because disk 6 evidently had zero to say. Disk 5 ended with Quentin setting out to follow his last clue and disk 7 began with him arriving at his destination, which begs the question as to what value disk 6 was in the first place! Obviously none. Disk 7 was short and had a really unsatisfactory ending. I didn't like either invertebrate Quentin or Margo at all; in fact I think she's a jerk.

I can't help but wonder why Green insists upon making his female characters jerks. I've read two of his novels (all I am ever going to read, rest assured) and in both the female is a loser and a jerk. Is he a misogynist that he does this? Or is it simply that he doesn't know any better? Actually, the question which interests me more is why John Green went out of his way to call me a liar? Indeed, he called every one of us self-publishing/indie authors liars. In a speech which he made to the Association of American Booksellers in 2013 (of which I was unaware until very recently), he stated:

We must strike down the insidious lie that a book is the creation of an individual soul laboring in isolation. We must strike it down because it threatens the overall quality and breadth of American literature...without an editor my first novel, Looking for Alaska, would have been unreadably self-indulgent.
From Brit newspaper The Guardian

In short, John Green thinks we're liars if we say we did it all ourselves (not that your typical indie author ever does this in my experience). Guess what, Green behind the ears? I did it all myself and I know other people did too, and no, I am not lying. The question is why are you so insecure that you need an entourage to write your books? And yes, Looking for Alaska was self-indulgent so you failed and all of your team with you. Deal with it.


Sunday, January 5, 2014

Unpredictable Webs by Darlene Quinn





Title: Unpredictable Webs
Author: Darlene Quinn
Publisher: Greenleaf Book Group
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

After crashing and burning in an earlier novel in this series, I decided just to get to the actual story I'm supposed to be reading - which is this one. I was desperately hoping this would actually have entertainment value and that I could penetrate further than 25% into it without having my stomach turned. In this novel, which is, unfortunately peopled with some characters from earlier novels in the series, fifteen-year-old Marnie Taylor hooks up online with "Brad" who turns out to be not Brad and solely interested in kidnapping and ransom - and it's not even the first kidnapping in the family's history. This ought to have promised a laugh if nothing else, but since it was pretty much like the previous one I read, it wasn't be much of anything else, I'm sorry to say.

My problem with Quinn in this novel is summarized perfectly on p28, in the first paragraph in chapter 6:

The moment the delicious Versace rep wheeled his sample trunk out the front door of De Mornay's and onto the snow-covered Chicago streets, Viviana sighed and kicked off her Maud Frizon pumps…while standing flat-footed, flexing her toes and rolling on the balls of her feet, reality hit. He's the epitome of stylish perfection. There's little chance that young man is straight.

Seriously? How many kinds of wrong wrong wrong can you squeeze into seven lines? First comes the shameless and tediously snobbish name-dropping (which to be fair isn't quite as bad here as it was earlier), then follows the insult to the Maud Frizon shoes which the name-dropping is supposedly championing! If these often expensive (Maud Frizons can got for up to $400 dollars although many are less than that) shoes are so wonderful, why is she quite evidently having to take them off her poor, aching feet? If they hurt her feet, why is she wearing them? And as if that isn’t bad enough, then comes the slur that only gay men know how to dress! And/or only gay men would be caught selling Versace! Granted you can ascribe that one to the sad character represented by Viviana De Mornay, but even that aside Quinn manages to name-drop twice and then sequentially insult those same names! Impressive, huh?

The problem (with the name-dropping; I don’t even want to get into the double-barreled insult to men of all stripes) is that it's done solely for the free exercise of snobbery. We know this because a sentence including the clause "Viviana sighed and kicked off her pumps" would have been perfectly fine. It doesn’t need to be "Viviana sighed and kicked off her Maud Frizon pumps" yet Quinn insists upon that rather than the shorter alternative. I honestly don’t get what writers who write like this are trying to accomplish other than to promote how appallingly shallow they are in broadcasting that a name is more important than whether you like the item, or than whether it suits you, or than whether it’s value for money, or most importantly: more than whether it’s actually a comfort to wear - which it clearly isn’t in this case!

Unpredictable Webs is, predictably, another waste of time given my poor experience with one of its predecessors. The predictably dishonest book blurb puts the online interaction and subsequent kidnapping of Marnie front and center, but after 100 pages, nothing had happened save the shallow interactions of superficial characters who were already nauseatingly encountered in Webs of Power. I don’t care about any of these predictable people or their tattered web. They offered me nothing to care for. Worse than this, we're never actually introduced to Marnie in any meaningful sense. She appears as a bit player in someone else's story (I have no idea whose, this is so badly put together), so where's the drama? Why on Earth should we care what happens to her when the author herself is so dismissive of her, so uninterested in her?

The promo for this novel claims that it’s a stand-alone: that you don’t have to have read any of the previous novels in the series to be able to read this, but even that isn’t true. If it stands alone, it’s by mere millimeters and on insubstantial legs, because there's a history here of which you're necessarily aware, but never party to if you haven't read any of the previous stories - and that speaks volumes.

The basic story is a good idea - of twins, one of whom was kidnapped (why only the one isn't explained) and then discovered sixteen years later and reclaimed by her biological parents. It’s a story which ought to be rich with conflict, torment, and anguish, with dramatic moments and moving interactions, but none of this materializes. The sad truth is that there's actually no family here at all, only individuals, not relating, unrelatable, their familial interactions relatively poor. The story ought to appear as a horrible predicament for anyone to be put into, much less a mid-teenager, yet there is no drama here. There isn't even any interaction worth the name. We don’t get to see how Marnie fits or fails to fit in. We don’t see her in any meaningful or deep interaction with her bio mom & dad, her adoptive mom & dad, or her twin sister, which is frankly, shameful. It’s all completely flat, shallow, and unremarkable. Watching ducks on the still surface of a pond would be deeper and more entertaining even if you couldn’t feed them.

I was unable to perceive Marnie (or anyone else for that matter) as a real person because she was only ever a paper doll, so I really don’t care if she's kidnapped or not, or if she's having a hard time or not. I wanted to read this for the kidnapping, but given that she was already kidnapped before the story began, this supposedly original story of a promised kidnapping seemed at best like a re-run, warmed-over but served cold, and life is way too short for undercooked leftovers when there are new, inventive, original, and engaging stories elsewhere in which to become immersed. When page after page drifted by like wilted spring petals in a cold creek, and the promised kidnapping continued to fail to show up, my impulse to read the story dwindled further with every screen until it was extinguished completely. The author kidnapped the story and no one knows where it's being held. This rates only a 'warty' and I'm done reading Darlene Quinn novels.


Saturday, January 4, 2014

Webs Of Power by Darlene Quinn





Title: Webs Of Power
Author: Darlene Quinn
Publisher: Greenleaf Book Group
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

I agreed to read a sequel to this, and I decided that if I were going to do that, I really ought to read the first book (in what is now a quadrilogy) beforehand. Note that these novels are, as far as I can tell, written as stand-alones even though they're connected, so you don't have to read them in sequence or have to have read one, two, and three before you can read four, but it seemed a good idea to me. Unfortunately I really disliked this first novel and could not finish it.

I made it through about 25% of the novel (the first 25 chapters or so), but even then I found myself frequently skipping screens here and there because it was utterly uninteresting to me. Maybe impoverished people who are desperate for some glamor in their lives might find this appealing in the way it's appealing to squeeze hard on the back of your neck when you have a headache and are waiting for the ibuprofen to kick in, but it's better not to do whatever it was that tensed you up and gave you the headache in the first place. If so, good luck to them, but it's not my idea of a good time and life is way too short to waste it on un-entertaining, un-engrossing unrealistic stories.

Set in the 80's, the novel focuses upon three women who's entire life (based on what I read) apparently consists of nothing but being an accessory to the men in their lives. They're obsessed with the high life and with designer clothes, and with snotty clothing labels and conspicuous consumerism, as indeed it would seem, is the author. I thoroughly detest and abhor the pretentiousness and snottiness of novels of this nature. I could not even remotely begin to identify with any of them, nor respect a single one of them, nor find any reason whatsoever to take any interest in, let alone root for any of these spoiled brats - so why read on?

Paige Toddman is married to a CEO of a mega-corporation and finds herself pregnant with a child which may or may not be her husband's (the writing made it hard to tell). But at least it will have a designer crib, and designer clothes, and designer toys, and designer foods. Maybe it's even a designer baby, and what on Earth could be more important in any child's life than that it has well-known and clichéd names in its all clothes and possessions?

Ashleigh McDowell is pretty much a cookie-cutout of Toddman. Viviana De Mornay is yet another cutout, but older and heavily into "cosmetic" surgery so she can maintain the lie of youth and steal the fabulously wealthy husband of some other rich chick. Who cares?

Every other line in this novel contains a name-brand or someone whining about something. No one drives away in a car, instead, they drive away in their [substitute conspicuous name such as Porsche]. The corporate exec kinda guy doesn't stand with his Chivas Regal by the pool, but by the Olympic-sized swimming pool, because just any old pool couldn't possibly be rich enough. He doesn't put on his tailored suit, but his Armani suit. It is seriously stomach-turning to read this page after page and paragraph after paragraph. Did the author get sponsored to write this novel? I'm sorry but I simply cannot get with a novel that parades sponsorship names like a racing car - they're always non-starters for me.

All three of these women are in crisis all the time when they're not obsessively lusting after the guy who owns them. Yes, owns them. If I had to draw a conclusion about Quinn based solely on this novel, I'd be completely convinced that she's convinced that no women has anything going on in her mind other than rich designer names and what they can do to please their owner next. That's apparently all they're good for: to be dressed up as dolls by a guy who owns their every thought, waking and sleeping. This novel is worse than an insult to women: it's evidently a 369 page rape and subjugation of women. Oh and there's some unimportant and irrelevant stuff about corporate take-overs in there.

This novel is WARTY. Hopefully the sequel I was originally planning on reading will be a thousand percent better than this one was.!


The Prophecy of the Stones by Flavia Bujor





Title: The Prophecy of the Stones
Author: Flavia Bujor
Publisher: Miramax Books
Rating: WORTHY!

The Prophecy of the Stones shortly to be followed by its sequel, The Prophecy of the Beatles! (I may have made that up). On a serious note, I also have reviewed Nancy Yi Fan's Swordbird which is another novel written by a young writer - in this case younger even than Bujor.

This is rather an amazing novel at least in the one sense that it was written by a girl who was thirteen at the time she began writing it. That's an impressive feat, so how could I not check it out? The story is actually a dream of a sick and perhaps dying girl in modern day Paris, and it relates the adventures of three girls (curiously all the same age as the sick Parisienne, and also as the author was when she began this novel!).

The three girls are named after gemstones. Amber, the girl who was raised on a farm, Jade, the girl who was raised by a duke, and Opal, the girl who was raised in a village by a rather feared old woman. There's no mention of whether they ever meet up with Ruby Red...! None of the girls was raised by her own parents. On the night of their fourteenth birthday, all are given the stone after which they're named and told that they must trust no one and must leave home that very night to meet the two other girls. Oh, and one more thing: everyone should be considered an enemy, including the other two girls! When they meet under the specified tree out in the wilds they must, after midnight, open the bag and take out their stone. Unfortunately, Opal has already accessed hers, not long before, and not even knowing what it was.

So oddly enough, even after all this, they do indeed meet, and they're suspicious of each other, but nothing odd happens and they eventually agree to work together to try and find out what the deal is with these freaking stones. They plan to spend their first night in an old barn which is frankly disgusting to Jade, so she visits the farmhouse and demands to be put up there! She also demands sufficient food for the next several days' travels, and she gets everything she asks for! The three of them decide they need to go to Nathyrnn to meet a guy who supposedly can tell them about the prophecy of the stones.

When they arrive at the city, they are in turn introduced to a knight from the land of Fairytale who they ask for advice. They decide that the only way to break the stranglehold of the Council of Twelve on the land is to get into Fairytale, a forbidden magical land which is walled off with a force-field. They proceed to breach the wall despite their government's dire warnings against such an action, and despite a virtual army waiting on the border. Nevertheless, they decide that fear is the enemy and they simply rush the soldiers, and almost all of them get through into Fairytale! Unfortunately, Opal dies, but fortunately, Death is on strike in Fairytale, and so Opal cannot die.

The trio continue with their quest to find a wise woman in Fairytale who will impart the knowledge they need to overthrow the council's iron-rule. Naturally, the council wishes to terminate the girls' power and so they launch an unprecedented invasion of Fairytale. The girls eventually find the woman and discover that they have to visit Death herself and talk her out of her strike...!

So what to do with this novel? Read it! This is a worthy read. Yeah, it's simplistically written and a bit bizarre, but I've read a lot worse novels by more mature writers who should know better. Those writers need not be encouraged. A writer like Bujor? She's needs to be brought on-board with all speed.


Shakespeare's Secret by Elise Broach





Title: Shakespeare's Secret
Author: Elise Broach
Publisher: Scholastic
Rating: worthy

At first blush, this appears to be a Shakespeare conspiracy novel! The theory is that Shakespeare's plays were really written by Elizabethan nobleman Edward de Vere. We're offered a limp triad of evidence supposedly supporting this bizarre claim: firstly that Shakespeare wasn’t well-enough educated to have written his plays, having "only" a grammar school education; secondly that when he died he was not eulogized throughout the land as a famous playwright ought to have been, and thirdly, that Shakespeare left no collection of books and manuscripts behind when he died. I can’t believe that Broach uses the utterly absurd argument that Shakespeare used different spellings of his name! That's downright ignorant, especially when she puts it into the mouth of a purported Shakespeare scholar! I'm not a big fan of Shakespeare, so what do I care? Well, I do care about dishonesty purveyed as truth!

The fact that the Oxfordian 'theory' of Shakespeare authorship (which attributes Shakespeare's plays to contemporary Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford) was invented by a guy whose last name was "Looney" should tell you all you need to know about that. The fact that de Vere was evidently such a great author that he could compose twelve of Shakespeare's plays long after his own death in 1604 ought to tell you everything else! The spelling of words (and particularly of names) was not solidified until relatively recently, so the fact that Shakespeare (and everyone else, including de Vere) used variant spellings is meaningless. Strike one leg of this three-legged stool (with the emphasis on stool).

The fact that Shakespeare was grammar-school educated and clearly could write (if he could write his name!) means there is no issue at all with him being technically capable of writing plays. The fact that he was one of the world's best known rip-off artists, copying his plays from earlier works by others, and making a few changes here and there, removes any need for Shakespeare to have been a well-read and well-traveled man, and it also removes any basis for an argument that "a merchant" could not have dreamed up the ideas. Strike leg two. Shakespeare was revered in his own time, but not throughout the country, and not in all circles. It was only posthumously that his name has become so famous and so widely known, so it’s hardly surprising that there was no national outbreak of mourning upon his death. Thus the entire stool crashes down.

But let’s focus on the novel. Hero Netherfield and her family, including older sister Beatrice, are in Maryland - a new state, a new town, and a new school starting in the morning. Why they left their move to the last minute isn’t explained. They’ve moved into a house which supposedly has a diamond hidden somewhere on the property. Beatrice, attending as different school to hero, easily adapts to new places and new people. Hero always feels like she's the odd one out. Their parents met in an Eng. Lit. class and found a common language, and whilst each member of her family seems to have found a source of contentment, Hero has yet to find hers.

Hero is a twelve-year-old who is your standard YA (in this case pre YA, but it's all the same) female: disaffected young girl, moved to a new town, starting at a new school, doesn't fit in, she's plain yet the hottest guy in school falls for her, everyone makes fun of her, mean girls are nasty to her. On short it's the saddest collection of pathetic tropes imaginable - and it's too young for me! So why the interest? Well, I haven't reviewed anything with a Shakespeare element yet in this blog, and this novel did sound interesting. Plus, bonus: it's not first person PoV! Hurray! Elise Broach actually gets it. Also, Hero is part of an actual family! She's not all alone, or with a step parent, or from an orphanage or a broken home. And Broach can write. The intrigue and drama are a bit forced, but it's acceptable to me, and I'm sure the intended age range would have no trouble with it.

The basic plot consists of Hero's discovery that there is supposedly an old and valuable diamond hidden somewhere on the property she just moved into. Being named after a character in Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, Hero is awakened to the Elizabethan era, to Shakespeare, and to King Henry's the Eight's first beheaded wife. She has to search the house for the hidden diamond, all there's the whole wondering what Miriam and her new friend Danny are up to. The ending is a bit trite and quite predictable, but for the age group, it'll do!

I had some real issues with the "Shakespeare really didn't write his works" wacko angle that Broach seems to buy into. I'll go into that soon on this blog, but be prepared for a huge amount of bias confirmation in the Broach approach, with liberal lack of any critique of the Oxfordian perspective. There are no real Shakespeare scholars who buy into alternative authorship of Shakespeare's plays and sonnets, so that oughta tell ya everything you need to know about Shakespeare conspiracy theory! Broach is also seriously, indeed dishonestly, misleading about the Elizabeth 1 - Catherine Parr - Thomas Seymour scandal. Other than that, the story is a worthy read for the intended age group.


Wednesday, January 1, 2014

The Bone Collector by Jeffery Deaver





Title: The Bone Collector
Author: Jeffery Deaver
Publisher: Bantam
Rating: worthy!

This is a movie/novel review. The movie is reviewed on the 0-J movie page.

So it's after noon on the first of the year. It seems like a decent time to surface and start this year the way I intend to complete it: reviewing stuff! Hopefully good stuff. At least in the majority. And whilst this blog is primarily about writing and reading, it's also about other dynamic visual media such as movies and TV. so I thought I'd start the year with a novel/movie review. The Bone Collector is an older novel, published in 1997, but it's a good one and became a movie in 1999, but the tow have very little in common when you get right down to it.

The biggest problem with this novel is that it's really, really, and I mean really, do I hear a really? Yes! Really hard to generate any tension or drama over the question of whether Lincoln Rhyme will commit suicide when this novel is the first in a long series! It's the starter for Deaver's Lincoln Rhyme series, of which there are ten in print, with a new one due to be published 2014. I first saw it as a movie and decided to start this year by reviewing the novel itself, since I've read neither it nor anything else by Deaver.

The story begins with a couple arriving in New York City at the airport, being picked up by a cab, but instead of arriving at Fifth avenue, the sleeping couple awaken to discover they're being driven through a mess of broken-down factories. The cabbie pays no attention to their protests and they cannot open the doors from the inside. The woman tries to break a window using her laptop, but succeeds only in breaking the laptop

Next we're in New York City with foot patrol officer Amelia Sachs (they changed the last name in the movie to make her seem Irish. I have no idea why - maybe they're anti-Semitic?!). In the novel she wants out of patrol work and into public affairs to rest her prematurely arthritic joints. In the movie she wants out to join the youth squad. She gets a call to investigate a report of a body at the railroad tracks under a really old bridge. The "body" is actually a hand rising above the gravel bed, with the flesh of the forefinger missing, and replaced with an engagement ring. Sachs digs down to the face, but the victim is already dead. She takes charge of the crime scene (not buying a camera as she does in the movie, but in closing down a street and stopping a train, for both of which she gets into trouble. In the movie, she gets chewed out just as in the book, and in both cases it seems too forced to be true - like we need to have a really ham-fisted, red-herring of a dumb cop for some reason?

These smart and positive actions on her part bring her to the attention of a morose Lincoln Rhyme, who is a quadriplegic, having been appallingly injured (C4 crush) on the job four years before. We see this in the movie, but don't get a flashback in the novel. Ex detective Rhyme is much more angry and sad in the novel than the movie. Once he comes on board with the investigation, he demands and gets everything he wants in terms of support and equipment to run down this "unsub" as the killer is referred to. It's all set up right there in his bedroom (which is huge). Deaver loves to show off how much research he's done into Forensic criminalistics, which is in equal parts interesting and annoying. He could have done with less and still had a good novel.

One of the biggest changes between novel and movie is the overly large switch of genders of so many characters and victims. Again, no idea why. The team quickly realizes that the body Sachs uncovered was one of a couple who were kidnapped from the airport in a cab, and the woman is still alive - until 3pm (4pm in the movie - why? No idea!). Thus far the genders match in movie and novel, and they meet their ends in the same way. The third vic is a guy in the movie, not a third generation American women of German ancestry, which deaver uses to publish some entirely unnecessary and irritating German conversation/thoughts. The third vic meets her/his end by the same means, but in the movie the guy is tied-up like the second victim, whereas in the novel, the girl is simply badly injured, tied-up but not tied to anything, and left lying in an alley. She survives, the guy does not.

In the end I can confirm that this is a worthy read. Deaver does annoy me in his writing, which is why I don't plan on following this series (I don't see where it can really go effectively, and I didn't find it interesting enough), but he does create a good ending which is very different from the subsequent movie, as indeed is the perp. The novel is better than the movie, but the movie is worth a watch, if only once!