Sunday, November 23, 2014

My Family Tree and Me by Dušan Petričić


Title: My Family Tree and Me
Author: Dušan Petričić
Publisher: Kids Can Press
Rating: WORTHY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

It's Kids Can Press day today on my blog, and I have two reviews of cool books both from the same publisher, and both aimed at young children. My Family Tree and Me (not to be confused with Me and My Family Tree) is by storied writer Dušan Petričić, who has a long list of books to his name. I've often railed in my blog against manga created in the west, but presented in Japanese form: back to front (from our perspective). Well here's a book that's both back-to-front and front-to-back - and it makes sense!

The "story" here is nothing more than a family history told in poetical form, but it's amusingly illustrated with a weird and wonderful diversity of characters (that pesky neighbor's kid even manages to get his face in there at one point!). The book follows the father's lineage from the front to the center of the book, and the mother's lineage from the back to the center, both meeting in a large family portrait in the middle. Though I don't normally talk about book covers, because writers typically have little to do with them, this one is cool because for once it follows the story exactly - showing both sides of a "family tree". It was a delight instead of a disappointment.

It's an inventive and charming idea and it works. I read this with my thirteen-year-old who is obviously way too old for this kind of book, but we were both of us laughing by the end - or rather by the middle. I recommend it as a great learning tool for children who ask "Where did I come from?" Obviously there are several answers to that question(!) and this is only one of them, but it's a good one!


Saturday, November 22, 2014

Harry and the Hot Lava by Chris Robertson


Title: Harry and the Hot Lava
Author: Chris Robertson
Publisher: Xist Publishing
Rating: WORTHY!

Errata:
The pages are not numbered, but there is one where "it's" is used in place of the correct form for the context: its.
There's also a page prior to this where lava is described as "most dangerous liquid known to man". I had a couple of issues wioth this, but the important one is the use of 'man'. Is it necessary to exclude woman so rigidly? Could it not be (hoever inaccurate it might be) "most dangerous liquid known to life", or "to humans" or somethign less exclusive? There are almsot four billion women on this planet. Can we not remember them a bit mroe often?

This is a very short children's picture book, so there isn’t a lot to review. It’s about a kid with a delightfully wild imagination (he reminds me of my own kids whose imaginations, thankfully, have never deserted them even though they're now way too old for a book like this), who appears to be stranded amidst hot lava which is invading his home from all quarters. Can he leap to freedom? Where will he land? (You might be surprised!)

The drawings are rudimentary but very colorful, and really evocative. The book is as full of excitement and danger as Harry is full of ideas and wild descriptions, but he never panics, and is always planning his escape. This is definitely something your kids will want to play - perhaps after exploring what real lava looks like - not in person of course - but from the safety of a TV documentary or something on the web.

Who knows, perhaps you have a budding vulcanologist in your family? I recommend this book for a fun read alone, but it’s also a great starting point for a chance to stir your child's imagination about the wonders of planet Earth and it's geology and inner structure.

Of course, you don't want to load them up with learning, learning, learning and nothing else, so it occurs to me that a whole day could be themed around this as they're encouraged to explore the idea, starting with the book, then a video, then perhaps go looking for rocks in the yard or at the park (assuming your park isn't buried under snow at this point!), and imagine how hot things would have to be to melt an actual rock! You can have them practice their motor skills emulating Harry's escapes (with due safety precautions, of course!), have them develop confidence and cool-thinking skills, and also have them appreciate a little more the wonderful and complex planet on which we're all privileged to live.


Clerks (The Lost Scene) by Kevin Smith


Title: Clerks (The Lost Scene)
Author: Kevin Smith
Publisher: Oni Press
Rating: WORTHY!

Penciled by Phil Hester
Inked Ande Parks

For those familiar with Kevin Smith's movies, this will be standard boilerplate stuff. It's not really a lost scene - merely one they couldn't afford to pay for when they were making the movie Clerks, so it was cut from the script. I believe it was included in the animated series, which I've not seen. Now, using Kevin Smith's script and artwork by Hester and Parks, it lives, if only in static pictorial format.

If you're a huge fan of the movie, which I'm not (although I do think it worth watching), then you might enjoy this. Otherwise it probably won't be of much utility to you unless you're really into Smith and/or gross-out comics. It is funny, I admit!

The story is of Dante and Randal (the two clerks from Clerks, of course) going to Julie Dwyer's funeral, and an unfortunate incident with some mislaid car keys and an open casket. There's a three page intro featuring Jay and Silent Bob, followed by 17 pages of story and finally a one page outro, and that's it. The artwork is grey-scale, and it and the script are very average, but I do recommend it for fans.


Friday, November 21, 2014

The Wicked + The Divine by Kieron Gillen


Title: The Wicked + The Divine
Author: Kieron Gillen
Publisher: Tim Nolen
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

Artwork by Jamie McKelvie (website worth a visit - I love the opening page (as of today's date the girl on the telephone pole)
Coloring by Matthew Wilson
Lettering by Clayton Cowles (another amusing website - as of today's date, Empire fighter craft versus a witch on a broom?)

This is an amazingly original story about gods and humans. Note that this is a compendium volume featuring the first five issues. I love that it was subtitled "The Faust Act"! Anyway, these gods are reincarnated in young human bodies every ninety years, but they only live for two years before the human body dies and they go dark again. They don’t know when they will be reincarnated because not all of them are incarnate at once. The gods are treated like celebrities - music and movie stars. They hold concerts and the younger generation flocks to see them

I love that Luci (guess what that's short for!) was female. She was by far the most complex and intriguing character, especially when she was arrested for exploding the heads of two people who were firing automatic rifles into her apartment - the problem is that during her trial, the judge's head also explodes in a similar fashion, and she's immediately imprisoned.

A girl whom Luci earlier befriended now takes up her cause, and seems to be the only person interested in doing so. None of the other gods seem to care. The conversations between these two, and between Luci and a blogger-journalist are fascinating. The fun really ramps up though, when Luci loses patience and breaks out of jail.

One problem I had with this graphic novel was that on some pages, the text was rendered in such a tiny font that it was really hard to read, even in a full-screen Adobe Digital Editions reader ebook. Fortunately it wasn't that many pages, so it wasn't a huge issue. Other than that, the artwork, coloring, and lettering were exemplary: beautiful, bright, brilliantly colorful, clean and sharp - and really eye-catching. It was a joy to see as well as to read. I was spoiled for choice in trying to narrow it down to my usual two or three samples that I post on my blog, so I tried somehtign brand new (for me!) this time and put all my faovrites into a GIF. This is the first time I tried this, so I hope it works OK.

I read some other reviews after I wrote mine, and I noticed that some people were confused by this graphic novel. It really isn’t confusing at all, but I grant that it does take a while to get into it. Other reviewers bemoaned the fact that they didn’t have enough background on the gods: why do they come, why do they have to die? The god who started it all, Ananke made it quite clear why they come and what they want: they want to be adored, but these reviewers were right in one regard: it didn’t explain why the visit was confined to only two years. Maybe it’s explained later in the series (this compendium covered only the first five volumes and had a great "ending"). I'm guessing it’s because they don’t want to devalue the currency! Or maybe the presence of a god in a mortal body burns it up really fast. A better question is why they need the physical body.

I recommend this for a really good read, and for an original story, and for something which was truly creative, imaginative, and inventive. This is everything a really great comic should be.


That's How Much I Love You by Lisa, Olivia, Emma & Jack Bergren


Title: That's How Much I Love You
Author: Lisa, Olivia, Emma & Jack Bergen
Publisher: Bergen Creative Group (no website found)
Rating: WORTHY!

Illustrated by Kathryn E Mills

Not to be confused with Julie Rudi's children's book of the same name (which I have not read, but about which I've heard good things), this is a young children's book which features a discussion between mommie dog and toddler dog, revolving around who loves the other more. I think mom wins! This book boasts charming illustrations in direct support of the text, which are crisply-drawn, yet softly-colored, some of them in tones reminiscent of sepia prints, but all of them quite colorful, which adds to the warmth.

Mom unleashes a tour de force of comparisons, some of which might come in handy for you to tell your young loved one. How many trees are in the forest? Well, sadly fewer than there used to be these days, but still a huge number! How many raindrops are in a cloud? Woah! A staggering number! How many waves on the ocean? Far too many to count even if you could freeze-frame the ocean to begin with. And more and more.

Mom and child go surfing on the endless grains of sand (I am not kidding you!). They lie on a flower-covered hillside. They sit toasty-warm enjoying hot chocolate (or maybe mom had some fresh coffee and a wee nip as she sits with her wee nipper, who knows!) and watching countless snowflakes outside. They go camping under myriad stars. They go frolicking in a wheat field - for which the farmer probably won't thank them, but don’t you just want to do that same thing?!

No matter where they are or what time of year it is, they’re always together, always communicating. The text is confident and loving, supportive and realistic, despite it being soaked liberally with the obvious exaggeration of a parent or guardian's love for their charge.

I loved this positive and affirmative story and I don’t doubt that children will too.


Thursday, November 20, 2014

Model Undercover: New York by Carina Axelsson


Title: Model Undercover: New York
Author: Carina Axelsson
Publisher: Sourcebooks
Rating: WORTHY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

I have to say up front that I'm not a fan of fashion stories or modeling stories because I detest the fashion and modeling world. Never has there been - not even including Hollywood and TV, a more self-centered, self-obsessed, pretentious and shallow enterprise as these. I despise those who spend thousands upon clothes and accessories when there are sick and starving children throughout the world, but fiction is not the same as the real world, and once in a while I've found a story that's interesting, and which doesn't take itself too seriously. It's those rare few which keep me cautiously coming back looking for another one! This novel turned out to be such a one.

The premise here is that Axelle, a sixteen-year-old girl, is both a model and a "sleuth" - but primarily (so she keeps limply protesting) the latter. Why anyone thinks grown-ups will respond positively - or even politely - to a relentlessly inquisitive sixteen-year-old goes completely unexplained, but let's let that slide right on by: this is fiction, after all!

Having solved a puzzle in Paris (presumably in an earlier volume which I have not read), Axelle now believes she's a brilliant detective and can solve anything, which is why she's just arrived in New York City. An extremely valuable black diamond has been stolen during a modeling shoot, and she's supposed to discover who took it. Carbonado diamonds are rare, and are thought to be formed - unlike other diamonds - in stellar explosions, so they are really intriguing - to me at least.

In amongst slurs aimed at London (referenced constantly in a rather snobbish way, but paradoxically run-down in comparisons with NYC) and at vegan cuisine, we discover that Carbonado (black) diamonds (which do actually exist)are supposedly almost impossible to cut without incurring serious damage. They are harder than other diamonds, but this doesn't necessarily mean they will shatter if you cut them. Since this particular one - the Black Amelia (named after one of its owners, who was Amelia - not black!) - is so very distinctive, the thief is going to have a hard time getting rid of it, so perhaps the theft wasn't because of the value per se of the diamond, but because the thief had a grudge against the owner, or was intent upon blackmail.

There were no security guards at the shoot (idiots!) because the owner is a friend of the editor of the fashion magazine, and the editor is evidently too stupid to hire her own security. The shoot was closed and limited to only a handful of people, all of whom were really successful in their fields, so the motive looks a lot less like petty theft, as it were, and a lot more like revenge or blackmail. Cassandra, aka Cazzie, the British editor of Chic fashion magazine, idiotically fails to notify the police (they don't want bad publicity!) and she's the only one who knows that Axelle is here primarily as a detective, not as a model.

So the author seems to have everything locked-up to explain these oddball circumstances, but there's one problem: Cassandra, aka Cazzie, is receiving texts from someone who appears to have the diamond. So why all the cogitating on Axelle's part about motive? Clearly this is the motive - to taunt and embarrass Cazzie for some reason. What makes less sense right here is that they now have someone the police could conceivably track down yet not once do they consider bringing them in. This made no sense to me. It's also weird that the texts don't start rolling in until Axelle is on the scene, isn't it?

The text-taunter tells Cazzie that there will be three riddles which she must solve or she won't see the diamond again. Interestingly, Cazzie is able to respond this time - she wasn't before - and the taunter tells her that she's pissed him/her off, so the first riddle will be delayed. The taunter never used the word 'diamond' to begin with, instead talking about 'treasure', so I began to suspect that it was entirely possible that this was unconnected with the theft of the diamond. That would have been a nice red-herring, but no - the text-taunter uses it later - after Cazzie has used it. It was at that point that I wondered: is Cazzie doing this all by herself?

Axelle gets an email which she thinks is from the same source as the texting - this warns her to butt out. I suspected that this came from Sebastian, an insufferably over-protective out-of-favor boyfriend of Axelle's, but that was just a wild guess, and it was wrong. Sebastian is a jerk and I didn't like him, even given that Axelle is flying-off-the-handle over him. The fact that she's cluelessly wrong about him is another irony. The detective - clueless?!

I have to say I find all foreign characters annoying when they're depicted as speaking perfect English yet nonetheless are reduced to interspersing it with words or phrases from their native tongue. Thus we get Miriam the maid peppering her dialog with French, which is not only pretentious, it was really annoying. If you can't depict a foreign character without being forced to make them spew a brew of Franglish or whatever language combo, then make your character English. Otherwise find a way to depict their foreign nature by doing work on the character-building instead of taking the lazy way out. Please? Just a thought.

The weird thing is that while Axelle wisely tries to get Cazzie to stir-up the text-taunter in an effort to have him/her to give themselves away, when this is going on, Axelle fails completely to station herself next to one of the suspects to see if they're texting when the taunter responds. That's just plainly stupid. If she thinks it's one of a small group, then all she has to do is be close to each one in turn during one of these exchanges. In this manner, she could at least eliminate some - those who were not texting - even if she can't necessarily zero in on the actual perp right away. This doesn't speak strongly to her smarts, but then Axelle is only sixteen and not the most worldly of people despite all her claims to being widely traveled.

Without wanting to give anything away, I chose two people as the prime suspects quite early on in this story, and one of them soon seemed unlikely. The other one, it turned out, actually was the thief! If I can get it right when I'm typically lousy at that kind of thing, I suspect the villain was way too obvious!

Aside from that, the writing in general was not bad. There were one or two exceptions, such as where I read, "...the studio was shaped like an L. A curtain..." which was misleading, because it initially read - to me - like "LA curtain - as in Los Angeles curtain! It took me a second to realize what it actually was. It would have been nice had the author put the 'L' in single quotes, like I did just then, to clarify this.

The novel moved at a decent pace and was - refreshingly - very light on fashion and make-up, which I really appreciated! It was also pretty decently plotted (in general) with a nice twist here and there. It had rather shallow, but otherwise reasonably realistic characters, so despite some early misgivings about this I was, by the end, convinced that it was a worthy read. I can't pretend that I'm waiting breathlessly for a sequel, but you might be after you've read this one!


It Falls to Us by Tim Nolen


Title: It Falls to Us
Author: Tim Nolen
Publisher: Tim Nolen
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

Erratum:
P13 "Yeah, we'll you'll need…" should be "Yeah, well you'll need…"

I don’t do covers because this blog is about writing and writers have little or nothing to do with the cover (unless they self-publish). Covers are all about misdirection, fluff, and advertising and generally have nothing to do with the story. In this case, the only reason I found the cover interesting was that the design of the silhouetted superhero's chest looks like a face - the two white roundels on the upper pectorals look like eyes, the straight vertical line dividing the pecs looks like a nose, the rounded lower portions of the pecs look like cheeks or jowls, and the cape billowing away to the right (as we look at the image) looks like long, flowing hair! Fluff.

This novel is 47 chapters in 114 pages which means really short chapters, especially since the text is pretty much double-spaced. It's a very short novel - perhaps even a novella (I don’t know the word count) - but then it’s part of the inevitable series, the whole point of which is to keep spinning the story out as long as possible. I should say up front that I don’t do series unless they're exceptional, and few are. I am not planning on following this one.

The novel doesn’t have a prologue - which I never read anyway. Instead, the author wisely put the prologue - where the old guard superheroes meet their come-uppance - into chapter one. See? It can be done, folks! Tim Nolen proved it!

This first chapter is trope and clichéd superhero stuff, which I was willing to put up with in the hope that the new generation in the following chapters would have something different and original to offer. They didn’t. It was just more of the same. I ran into a small problem on page three where I read, "…rabbit punched her in the face…" A 'rabbit punch' is a blow to the neck - so it’s impossible by definition to rabbit punch someone in the face! Oh well….

In the very next paragraph the author confuses smoke with darkness - either that or the properties of a typical night vision image intensifier with the properties of a thermal imaging camera, by having someone with "night vision goggles" able to see through smoke, but let's let that slide by in its sentence fragment, because, in general, the writing wasn't too bad. There were however some real clunkers such as that on page 11, where I found this odd phrase describing part of a fight between younger generation hero 'Defiant' and super-villain 'The Wrecking Crew': "…sending Defiant sailing down the block, taking an enclosed bus stop with him. Defiant landed out into an intersection..." 'landed out into'? Fortunately most of it was good English.

One of the major problems with this for me was that it’s not a graphic novel, but it read like one. I didn’t see that as a point in its favor. Had it been accompanied by panels of images on each page, then it would have felt like it was much more in its element. It just felt wrong for a text novel because there's no real attempt at descriptive or detail writing here, nor is there any attempt at creating atmosphere. It’s all straight-forward depiction of fights between heroes and villains, conversations, and preparations for the next fight. There's no world-building going on here - no deeper context.

After Defiant comes up with a smart decision on how to take down Wrecking Crew, he carts him off to jail, where we learn that the jail has a nullifier device which cancels the villains' powers. I was immediately thinking: if this is the case, how come the cops don't simply use one out in the field to nullify the villains' powers and arrest them? Why do we need superheroes? How come the villains don’t have one to use against the superheroes? Apparently the reason for this is that there is only the one and it’s huge - buried in the ground under the six cells it powers.

There was one incident which I felt was rather racist, which is where some thugs threaten a character named Veronica, and Defiant comes to her rescue. This is yet another instance of a girl needing rescue by a guy, but that wasn't even the worst part of it. The thugs were given dialog that sounded like a white person's ill-considered attempt at 'Ebonics' - thereby identifying the thugs as black. I don't know if this was the intention or not, but the implied association of 'black' with 'thug' wasn't appreciated. I can't speak to whether the entire cast of this story (apart from aforementioned thugs) was white, because there really was very little description of anything.

As if that wasn't bad enough, the major villain's name was Blackheart! He is the one who negates the four main superheroes at the start, but he reminded me of Doctor Evil in the Austin Powers movies! He just didn’t seem like a real villain - more like a caricature. I made it to fifty percent of the way through this book before I ditched it. It just wasn't interesting enough to keep pushing on, not when there are so many other books out there which I know will pull me in and hold my attention. I can’t rate this as a worthy read.


Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Dangerous Deceptions by Sarah Zettel


Title: Dangerous Deceptions
Author: Sarah Zettel
Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

This is the 372 page sequel to Palace of Spies which I reviewed favorably on my blog in mid-September last year, so I was thrilled to have the chance to review its successor as well. Unfortunately, I was very disappointed in this second novel in the series.

It was about a hundred pages too long for a start, and I don't even know where the title derived, because there really wasn't anything going on here that was dangerous or deceptive - at least not any more so than in the last volume. The last volume was equally mistitled, but it at least had the distinction of being a nearly unique title, unlike this one which is one amongst two dozen.

The protagonist is the brave, inventive and sometimes smart Margaret Preston Fitzroy, commonly referred to as Peggy. This is a first person PoV story - a person which I normally detest, but some writers can carry it and render it in a non-obnoxious form, and Sarah Zettel is, to my everlasting gratitude and adoration, one of these writers. She has a way of writing these stories that make them seem authentic and highly amusing. It felt like coming home when I read, "…my rooms had remained cold enough that my fingertips had achieved a truly arresting shade of blue." Bless you Sarah Zettel! The problem is that this tone disappeared rather quickly, and the novel became a bog-standard humdrum YA historical novel all too speedily. The highly amusing title page (see image on my blog) was soon lost under YA trope.

This is an ARC which I was reading, so sometimes there are issues, even though, in this electronic age, there is very little excuse for them. Spelling and grammar should never be a problem, and on this score, a publisher doth protest too much I find, but in this instance, things were fine until I reached the last complete paragraph in page two, where I discovered that words containing an 'e' followed by a 'k' as in "weeks" and "housekeeping" had the 'ek' replaced by a bizarre symbol that looked like a bow without a string (see image on my blog).

Similarly, any word which contained the combination "eh" had those two letters replaced with an apostrophe, so that on page 4, "behind" became "b'ind" and on page five, "horsehair" became "hors'air", and elsewhere "somehow" became "som'ow", and "behaving" became "b'aving". Weird! Hopefully this will be fixed before the final copy is released!

There were other issues which are arguably arguable! Such as, for example, would a woman of that era write "more important" (as we see on page three) or "more importantly"? I would guess the latter, but it’s just a guess. On page ten we read that an acquaintance of Peggy's "...sailed through life as well as doorways" which might have been more quickly grasped had it read, "...sailed through life as readily as she did through doorways". On page 91, we might ask the question of whether an English woman of the era would write "…out the window…" or "out of the window…." But each to his or her own. On page 127, she gets it right when she has Peggy use the phrase 'exclamation mark' rather than 'exclamation point'. And I seriously doubt anyone in 1716 would say "Half six" in relating that the time was 6:30. The Brits say it now, but not two hundred years ago.

At the very beginning of this novel, Peggy's life is at once complicated by the arrival of her would be rapist and betrothed suitor Sebastian Sandford bearing a gift of tea. He wishes to talk to her, but she will have none of him, yet he presents her with a rather expensive gift of tea (Twinings was established a decade before this novel begins!), and takes pains to let her know that he will be available when she realizes that she does indeed need to talk. Rapidly on his heels arrives her nasty uncle to demand that she marry Sandford, but she refuses, and her adorable cousin Olivia stands staunchly by her side, rebelling against her own father. It’s all go, innit?!

I found it rather inappropriate that a man should call upon a woman who is not a relative, and in her chambers, too. It seems scandalous to me; however, eventually Peggy does decide to meet with Sandford, but nothing occurs to trigger her change of mind, which I found rather false, given how much she detests him. In the end the choice is removed from her and she does meet.

The story went into the doldrums about two-thirds or three-quarters of the way through and became quite boring, so I skimmed until we got to around page 315, where we find ourselves with a Casino Royale style showdown at the card table. Except that this is piquet, and there are only two players: Sebastian Sandford's brother Julius, who is playing against Peggy. Peggy has planned out this challenge and this game carefully, knowing that she can win if she doesn’t lose her concentration. How this works, especially given that Julius is cheating, is a mystery.

Sarah Zettel doesn’t write card games with anywhere near the skill that Ian Fleming did. And she evidently doesn’t know the rules of piquet, either. The piquet deck has only 32 cards. From a regular deck, this would mean the removal of all cards with a value of two through six, since only 7 and above, plus face cards and aces are used.

What this means is that the ending which Zettel wrote for the game made no sense. Peggy's win involved an errant two of clubs which could never have been in a piquet deck to begin with! Even had the card not been a two, but instead had been a non-face card other than an Ace within the confines of a piquet deck, this still offers no explanation for the game-changing conclusion which was drawn. Where's the basis for the assumption that the extra card is the one in his hand rather than the one on the floor? And why does Julius give up so quickly and equanimously? It made no sense given what we'd been told of him.

At one point - and without wanting to give too much away, there's an issue of what the Sandfords and her uncle are up to, and the answer lies in them having in their possession a massive amount of something. It's so obvious that it’s pathetic what all of that stuff was being stockpiled for, yet Peggy can’t figure it out. An army marches on its stomach dontcha know?!

In conclusion, I can't recommend this. It was unnecessarily long - far too long - and it was boring in far too many places. The tedious trope relationship between Matthew and Peggy is so awful that it makes for cringe-worthy reading. How this could have sped so fast in a downhill direction after the first volume went so well is a mystery, but I'm done with this series now.


The Murder of Adam and Eve by William Dietrich


Title: The Murder of Adam and Eve
Author: William Dietrich
Publisher: Burrows
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

This rather juvenile novel begins with the narrator (yes, unfortunately it's yet another first person YA novel, because YA writers, particularly those in the US for reasons unknown, cannot at all handle third person) kayaking across a strait off the US north-west coast to an island where there's an old abandoned fort. The island is supposedly off limits - rendered that way by the US military because the old gun emplacements are unsafe.

Our narrator is writing a paper for high school, on old forts, and this is his excuse to sneak onto the island ♭ early ♪ one ♪ morning ♪ just as ♪ the sun♪ was rising... under cover of fog. As he does so, he info-dumps on his life, which is so tragic its boring. He's your standard trope YA under-privileged kid with few friends and little popularity who is no doubt about to become a superhero.

One of his reminisces concerns Andrea Martinez, and she's described as "...glossy hair, astonishing female architecture, teen queen smile, and 3.9 smarts..." I guess we should be thrilled that smarts even makes this list, but frankly it isn't much of a thrill. It's within the hands of writers to change these tropes and clichés. I can only ask once more why writers persist in their blanket refusal to do this. This isn't the only time, either, that I encountered this kind of thing in this particular novel. And yes, I know that teen thoughts often stray to such things. That doesn't mean that we have to go along with it and promote those thoughts. A main character in a novel should have something special about them - otherwise why do I want to read about them?

Nick goes inside the gun emplacement (it has bunkers underneath, and areas for munitions storage). He explores all of it, taking notes and photographs, and finally he discovers a metal plate on the floor, which eventually leads him to an area where he gets sucked horizontally along a tunnel, and loses consciousness. When he recovers, he's out in the open air, still on the island, and the fog is lifting. He shows absolutely no curiosity whatsoever about how this happened. He never returns to the bunker, not even to try and retrieve his phone and backpack. Instead, he goes back to the kayak and leaves the island!

This was completely unrealistic to me. It makes the main character look like an airhead at best, and a coward at worst. It's simply not conceivable that he wouldn't be the slightest bit curious, or that he wouldn't want to recover his stuff. But the story moves on, and starts moving quickly after that.

When Nick gets back to land, the village is deserted except for wild animals wandering around fearlessly. Suddenly, some creature - apelike, but more mean and aggressive - shows interest in him. Right that that point, a girl calls him by name and they escape the pursuit of this brutal creature on a motor launch. This girl doesn't even get the kind of description that Andrea did. She's simply, "A pretty girl...spiffy as a model...." Again, she's really of no interest except for her looks. This both saddened and irritated me.

Ellie - the girl, quickly transports Nick back to the Island he just left, where he meets an alien who quickly tells him that Earth is off track and he and Eleanor have been selected to get it back on the rails, otherwise it will have to be destroyed. They have to go back in time to do this. In short, it's bog-standard, boilerplate 1950's sci-fi!

In order to save Earth, we're told that E&N have to go backwards: they can't go to the future because it hasn't happened yet. This, of course, immediately makes a complete mockery of the time-travel claim the alien just made: that time loops and winds like a snarled fishing line - that it's like the board game Chutes and Ladders (in Britain that would be Snakes and Ladders). In short, it's nonsensical even within its own framework.

The plan is to send Ellie & Nick back to save the original Adam and Eve, and effectively reboot humanity. How this is supposed to work given that Ellie and Nick cannot possibly influence what happens over the fifty-thousand years of subsequent evolution and societal development, is yet another unexplained mystery in a novel that's evidently replete with them.

It's at this point that the author really screws up. He seems to be laboring under the creationist delusion that because scientists have 'identified' (but not really!) a genetic Adam and a similar Eve, that these two were the only two humans alive on the planet, and that they both lived at the same time and in the same place, about 50,000 years ago. This is patent nonsense. What's known as Y-chromosomal 'Adam' is estimated to have lived somewhere between ~140,000 and ~340,000 years ago. He was not the only person alive then. Neither is he the only person to leave descendants. Nor was he created ex nihilo - he had parents.

Mitochondrial 'Eve' is the female version of this 'Adam', traced through her mitochondrial DNA ('Adam' is traced via the 'Y' chromosome). Again, she was not the only woman alive back then, nor is she the only woman to leave descendants, and she also had parents, so this idea that there were the first two people, and all living people are descended from them is sheer nonsense. 'Eve' lived somewhere between 99,000 and 200,000 years ago, but the chances that both were alive at the same time are slim indeed, and the chances that they ever met are infinitesimally small.

This information is also subject to change dependent upon new genetic data being uncovered, as indeed happened in 2013 when a man was discovered who had a Y chromosome bearing genetic information which had not been mapped before. This alone would appear to push back the time of 'Adam' to long before the time of 'Eve'

Ellie & Nick next have to pass some tests, the nature of which is borrowed from the movie Cube wherein people find themselves in a cube with doors on all six walls, and have to figure out how to travel through from one cube to its neighbor without dying from booby traps.

The rooms here are much simpler, but nonetheless as frustrating and dangerous. The first requires strength, the second agility, and the third an intimate knowledge of the counter-intuitive so-called Monty Hall problem. None of this makes sense. Since the aliens have already chosen Ellie and Nick, why put them through this testing? What purpose does it serve? None that I could see.

Eventually the two of them wind up on the African savanna fifty thousand years ago, to carry out their mission to look for Adam and Eve and - if they think they're worth saving - hide them so that the Xu cannot come kill them. What?!! None of this makes any sense. I'd originally thought that the two were supposed to replace the originals, and I had all kinds of arguments about how ridiculous, dumb, and untenable that was, but this scheme makes even less sense!

These two are simply teenagers. They're untrained and unarmed, and not remotely dangerous, and they're supposed to not only survive out here, but also to find two humans in thousands, and speak their language, and DNA test them, and persuade these two Africans to come with these strange white folks and hide?! And what purpose will this serve? How will this improve the "human stock"?

But it's actually worse than this. The Xu are hunting Adam and Eve and will kill them if Ellie and Nick fail to find them and hide them. How is this any test of Adam and Eve? It isn't. It's nothing but a contest between the two modern teenagers, and the expert assassin aliens. In short, it's no contest at all, and even if E&N were to win, it would prove only that they got lucky or that they somehow managed to outsmart the aliens (which actually probably isn't that hard if the aliens are this stupid to begin with!).

It would say nothing about A&E, nor would it change history. It's completely absurd. The only way it could even hope to change anything is if the title proved out, and the original A&E were slain, leaving E&N to replace them, but even given this, it would have no effect, overall, on the next fifty thousand years of history. There would be no guarantee that the new A&E would eventually turn out to be the ones who pass their lineage down to modern times.

Ellie claims she received an education from the aliens prior to Nick's arrival, but she goes right on to prove that either this is a complete lie, or she's the worst student ever, neither of which options speaks very highly of her. She also claims she's a biology nerd who likes animals, (let's not get into the distinction between biology and zoology), but she doesn't grasp that it's a saber-tooth cat, not a saber-tooth tiger. Nor does she think for a second to warn Nick about crocodiles and other predators when they find a small creek to drink from - a creek that was so small that it was highly unlikely there would even be crocs and hippos there, but let's let that one slide right on by, shall we?

Neither of them think of heading upstream - away from the animals so they can a) avoid predators, and b) avoid the dirty water caused by the animals romping around, muddying the water, and urinating and defecating all over the place. Nick is just as bad. Right after they pass a skeleton - I mean immediately after - which sports bones of all shapes, sizes, and weights, just sitting there for the taking, they both agree that they need to find something to use as a weapon...! I was ready to ditch this after the incident at the creek, but I couldn't because I was really interested in finding out how hilarious their first interaction with other humans would turn out. I wasn't disappointed.

Having found a creek, instead of following it in the likelihood that they'd run into more humans, they leave it and head for the mountains. They don't seem to grasp that the creek must have inevitably sprung up from the mountains. These people are bone-headed and brain-dead stupid. When Nick is bitten by a snake, one of the locals finally shows up and saves his life. Ellie promptly names the black kid "Boy". Seriously? Could we be any more "southern states" if we tried?

When they meet the tribe, one of the males takes an interest in Ellie, and so Nick turns into a caveman and beats his face to a pulp - this is the guy who has been sent to rescue humanity from its violent future. What a total ass-hat. Yeah, start brawling over this girl because you're macho man lord and master, and she's jus' a po' weak lil thang who cain't perteck hersel'. It was at this point that I said "No more" and ditched this completely whack novel so I could move onto something better.


Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Little Women by Louisa May Alcott


Title: Little Women
Author: Louisa May Alcott
Publisher: ABDO
Rating: WARTY!

For some reason, this novel interested me for the longest time. There was something about the title which intrigued me, although I can’t say what it was or how it worked its influence. Finally, I decided to tackle this in an ongoing, if slightly unenthusiastic effort to read some of the so-called classics. I confess I've been almost singularly disappointed in this quest, and this novel was unfortunately no exception. It should have been titled "Little Mary Sues".

The story is rather autobiographical, drawing heavily on Alcott's own childhood (she is the Jo of this novel although their fates are different). It’s a story about four young sisters, Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy, and their rather privileged and truly boring lives. Their father is a soldier in the American civil war, and the four of them live with their mother in comparative luxury all the while hinting at how deprived they are.

I was particularly sickened by the farcical description of their Christmas, where they give up their breakfast to feed a horribly impoverished woman and her child who live nearby in abject and miserable circumstances; then they promptly forget about her for the rest of the novel (at least they did as far as I read before giving up in disgust - this attitude of theirs may not have held for the entire novel).

I could not help but ask: how is it helping that woman at all to lavish attention on her for a couple of hours on Xmas morning, and then let her rot for the rest of the year? It would have made a far more interesting novel had they invited her into their home to live with them until she could get out of the circumstances which held her cruelly and rigidly trapped. Their home was spacious and comfortable. They had plenty of room.

That's not the story we get however. The main story here appeared to be that of Jo's love interest over her new neighbor, which was boring at best. That's as far as I got before I ditched this. I've learned from other reviews that she did not marry "Laurie" but married a mature professor with whom she had a much closer mindset, so kudos for that.

From what I've read of Alcott's life, she was very forward-looking and progressive, being both a feminist and an abolitionist, which begs the question as to why she seemed so desperate to marry-off the four girls in this novel and effectively kill both their independence and careers, when she herself had a long and distinguished career and never married. I don’t care if this is considered a classic, or if it was a best seller when it was first published - it’s really not very good, and I can’t recommend it.


Fallout by Janine Johnston, Jeffrey Jones, Chris Kemple, Jim Ottaviani


Title: Fallout
Author: Janine Johnston, Jeffrey Jones, Chris Kemple, Jim Ottaviani
Publisher: G.T. Labs
Rating: WARTY!

This graphic novel is a pictorial representation of events leading up to the development of the atomic bomb which was used to almost literally erase the Japanese city of Hiroshima in 1945 and (along with the second bomb on Nagasaki) precipitate the end of World War Two. The bomb slaughtered some sixty thousand people, including twenty thousand Japanese troops, and it destroyed a munitions factory. That seems like a huge number of deaths and it is horrific without a doubt, but more destruction was rained down during Operation Meetinghouse, when the US napalmed helpless civilians in Tokyo, some one hundred thousand people died, and Tokyo was all but leveled; however, nothing has ever been built that's as fearful, as iconic, or as singularly destructive and pernicious as an atomic bomb.

This novel describes the work of the scientists who finally figured out how to bring uranium to critical mass so that it set off a chain reaction and so graphically demonstrated the immensely powerful principle of E=mc². The work began long before it was decided to use the bomb, and it was driven not by a desire to defeat Japan, but out of fear that the Nazis would develop such a weapon.

The black & white artwork is not that great, quite frankly. It's very inconsistent since it’s apparently drawn by more than one artist, and the story, believe it or not, is rather boring. How you can make a story like this boring is a mystery to me, but I had a bit of a time of it in reading this. I gave up about two-thirds or three-quarters the way through where the format changed to one featuring much more more text and a lot less imagery, in some sort of epilogue, which lost my interest completely.

The novel is quite technical in parts, which was interesting to me, but it was also boring to read an almost endless account of some aspects of the story, while other topics flashed by with barely a mention. For example, the obsession with recording the tediously on-going need to build-up a graphite barrier around the core of the nuclear reaction in early testing, was weird and pointless! Depict it and move on already! There also seemed to be some confusion about the atomic number of Plutonium - with 94 being confused with 49. Plutonium had no name back then, and was known only as a number. I'm not a physicist, but there is, trust me, a huge difference between Indium and Plutonium!

So, in short, I can’t recommend this graphic novel.


Monday, November 17, 2014

Lily Lemon Blossom Welcome to Lily's Room by Barbara Miller


Title: Lily Lemon Blossom Welcome to Lily's Room
Author: Barbara Miller
Publisher: CreateSpace Publishing
Rating: WORTHY!

Warmly illustrated by Inga Shalvashvili.

Lily Lemon Blossom has a whole series of books and I've read only this one, so my observations are somewhat blinkered. Keep that in mind! I had some minor mixed feelings about his book, but in view of the 'snapshot' that this represents in the series, I was willing to let them slide because the book has some very endearing and useful qualities.

On the downside - to get it out of the way! - I had a concern or two about Lily's isolation. I know this was a kind of 'private tour' of her room, but her entire life - based solely on this snapshot of it - was one of isolation. There are no friends, siblings, parents or guardians either in evidence or even mentioned, which was a bit disturbing.

Her entire life in this one story centered around her solo activities. This doesn’t mean she doesn’t have friends, of course, or parents/guardians and brothers/sisters, but I would have felt a bit happier if some mention had been made of them. I mean if it had been indicated that she was grounded, or not well, or just wanted quiet time, or we were being treated to a secret special tour or something, and that's why we were confined to her room, that would have solved the problem for me.

There was also some conspicuous consumerism going on here! I'm not sure that this book would appeal to poorer families which have children who do not have so many toys and trinkets available for them to play with. That said, there was a lot on the positive side. Lily makes a tiara from bits and bobs, and she's rightly proud of it. That's a nice indication that you're not confined to the toys at hand: you can craft beautiful things out of odds and ends.

Lily also makes a point of keeping her room clean without being nagged - something from which my own kids could learn an admirable lesson. And she has a cat to hang out with, so she's not bereft of all animate companionship. Overall I liked this story, and Lily, and her ability to be alone and not get into a state, so on balance I think this is a positive story and I would recommend it for young children. It's very bright and colorful, although a little too prevalent with the 'pink is a girl's color' gender issue, but that's a relatively minor consideration given the positive things.


Vögelein: Old Ghosts by Jane Irwin


Title: Vögelein: Old Ghosts
Author: Jane Irwin
Publisher: Fiery Studios
Rating: WORTHY!

Vögelein is a German word meaning small bird. The character in this novel is more like a large insect (based on the wings) so the name is a bit odd. It's a huge trope that fairies have insect wings, angels have swan's wings, evil angels have bat wings, but I liked this story, and was quite intrigued by the world the author has created.

This is evidently an ongoing series, and I, as usual, dropped right down in the middle of it, but when your local library has a book sale and the books are hard cover (which this one actually wasn't) and they're dirt cheap, you don't ask too many questions! You just buy as many as you can before someone wises up to the fact that they're virtually giving these away! Or until your wife wises up to the fact that you're spending too much money on books. Again....

So this tells the story of a fairy who has a bad history (presumably related in volume one), and who isn't dealing with it too well. She now lives in the city, and has one or two friends, but she misses the old days of country living with someone to whom she had became very close. Even as she revels in her new-found freedom, she reminisces rather more than is good for her.

This fairy is really unusual, which makes me want to read the previous volume. She's a clockwork fairy, and has to be rewound with a special key every once in a while. She did not, evidently used to own her own key, but now she does, but she cannot rewind herself, so the problem is finding a reliable person to do this since she's also being hunted by a girl who is desperate to catch herself a fairy - for reasons unknown.

So in short, I really liked this story. Kudos to Jane Irwin for coming up with a fairy tale which interests me - because I'm not a fan of such! This story is original, interesting and well drawn.


Sunday, November 16, 2014

Thirteen At Dinner by Agatha Christie


Title: Thirteen At Dinner
Author: Agatha Christie
Publisher: AudioGO
Rating: WORTHY!

Published as Lord Edgware Dies in Britain in 1933, it appeared in the US under the title Thirteen at Dinner. Boring as the Brit title is, it's a far more accurate representation of events than is the US title. Thirteen at dinner might have been so, but it has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual murder and story, which is that of Hercule Poirot in pursuit of solving Lord Edgware's mysterious and confusing murder.

I was first introduced to Agatha Christie around the age of fourteen, when I was off school for the better part of a week, sick and in bed, and desperately looking for new books to read. The only ones available at the time were in the limited library of an older bother, so I got an early introduction to Ian Fleming's James Bond, and to Agatha Christie. It was an Hercule Poirot story that I read then, but I can't for the life of me recall which story it was. I don't think it was this one, but it could have been.

Note that Poirot is very much a rip-off of Sherlock Holmes, and he has a foil, Captain Hastings, who stands in for John Watson, and a less than excellent police inspector, Japp, who stands in for Inspector

I found this novel charming, a bit confusing, and entertaining, but I suspect that the bulk of the charm and entertainment came from Hugh Fraser's excellent performance in the audio book which I listened to. Normally I rail against the absurd pretension and affectation of publisher's claims that a reader is "performing" an audio book when all they're typically doing is simply reading it. Sometimes it actually is a performance, but such things are rare indeed. In this case, Fraser really turned in a confoundedly spiffing performance, what?!

This story doesn't begin with a murder, but with a request from the self-centered and self-absorbed actor Jane Wilkinson, also known as Lady Edgware, who asks Poirot to speak on her behalf to her husband and try and persuade him to grant her a divorce. Poirot does so and discovers, to his surprise, that Lord Edgware acceded to her request six months previously in a letter - a letter which Wilkinson later claims she never received.

Then comes the murder. Lord Edgware is found dead in his library with a knife wound to a critical position at the base of his skull. Naturally Wilkinson is the suspect, especially since she was seen entering Edgware's house by two people on the night of the murder - at around the murder time. The problem is that Jane was at a dinner party that night and has multiple witnesses to testify to this. It would seem clear that someone impersonated her.

It so happens that Poirot very recently saw another actor, Carlotta Adams, impersonating Jane Wilkinson on stage, and later attended a dinner party at Wilkinson's home to which Adams was also invited. Later, Adams is found dead of an overdose of a sleeping potion. There's also one more mystery: before the murder, Bryan Martin, an American actor, consults Poirot on the matter of his being followed by a mysterious man with a gold tooth. He also advises Poirot that Wilkinson is dangerous and might well carry out her publicly-voiced assertion that her husband has to die.

There are so many red herrings in this novel that I completely lost track of who was supposed to be the prime suspect at any one time. In the end, I could not figure out who dunnit and was a bit surprised to learn the answer! I also watched the Peter Ustinov movie based on this novel. It had been updated to contemporary times (for when the movie was made), and it really didn't work. I did not like Ustinov as Poirot, which is why this isn't a movie/novel review - I only review movies that I like!). Curiously, David Suchet was in that same movie playing the part of Inspector Japp to Ustinov's Poirot. Later Suchet went on to play Poirot in a lengthy TV series, and he was perfect for the role. Much better than Ustinov.

I recommend this audiobook.


To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee


Title: To Kill a Mockingbird
Author: Harper Lee
Publisher: Audio Partners (website not found)
Rating: WORTHY!

Ably read by Roses Pritchard.

I picked up this book because I finally couldn't stand not knowing what the big deal was about a two-kilo mockingbird. I guess I misheard the title...just kidding!

Set in the mid 1930's during the "Great Depression" (but written in the late fifties and published in 1960), this story is told from the PoV of Jean Louise Finch, who was known as "Scout", but it's told in retrospect, by an adult Jean, remembering events years ago. Jean's mother was dead, even back then, and she lived with her father, Atticus, a lawyer, and her older brother, Jeremy, who was known as "Jem".

Harper Lee denied that the novel was autobiographical, but her own father was a lawyer, she had an older bother, she hung out with a new guy in town who lived next door, and there was a boarded-up house nearby about which they made up stories. Many events in this story actually occurred in one way or another, although they were modified for this story.

The Finch family lives next door to the reclusive Radley family, and because of this, they make up stories about the Radley's - a family which both scares and intrigues them. During this time, a local black guy, Tom Robinson, is accused of assaulting a white girl - which back then, and especially in the south, was a pretty much an automatic death sentence whether the accused did it or not.

Atticus forbids his kids from watching the trial, but they sneak into the 'colored seats' up on the balcony. By some careful legal footwork, Atticus eventually shows the court that Mayella Violet Ewell, the girl accusing Tom, and her father, Robert E Lee Ewall, are lying. It was Bob who beat Mayella, not Tom. Despite this, Tom is found guilty, and is later shot 17 times when he supposedly tries to escape from prison.

This story borrows a lot from the real-life Emmett Till case, which was equally messed up, with exaggeration and dissemination on both sides. The sad thing there is that while nothing happened (at least not through the courts) to the accusers in that case, the accused paid heavily for this event - which constituted rudeness at worst and a misunderstanding at best - with his life, in an horrific torture and murder episode in the early hours of one morning - and the accused was only fourteen years old.

This story ends in Bob Ewell's death after he launches a cowardly attack upon Jean and Jeremy as they walk home late one night from a school Halloween pageant. Why Atticus even countenanced their being unescorted given the preceding campaign of threats and intimidation which Ewell had launched against Atticus and his home is a mystery and an appalling example of irresponsible parenting.

I don't know if I would have enjoyed this had I read it rather than listened to it. It was entertaining to begin with, then got boring, then became entertaining again. Roses Pritchard did a good job or representing the older Scout reminiscing.

The story isn't a really great story, and some negative reviews I've read call it out correctly in some regards, but to me a story is either worth reading (a five-star) or it isn't (a zero-star represented by a one-star since zero isn't an option). Yes the characters were a bit flat, and yes it was a very black and white story in more than one way, but did it entertain me? Yes!

Another complaint I read was that there was no character growth, but to me, character growth is over-rated! I don't need a character to grow in a story (unless they're really awful to begin with in which case growth is a requirement!). All I need is for the characters to be entertaining. Indeed, some stories which have entertained me well are enjoyable in part because the character doesn't change. In this case I neither expected it nor needed it, and I considered this one a worthy read - or more accurately, a worthy listen.


Saturday, November 15, 2014

Silver Bunny and the Secret Fort Chop by Eileen Wacker


Title: Silver Bunny and the Secret Fort Chop (I was unable to find this book at B&N, not available at Amazon)
Author: Eileen Wacker
Publisher: Once Kids
Rating: WORTHY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

Illustrated by Curt Spurging.

Erratum:
P4 "moive" should be "movie"

This is another in a growing series of which I reviewed one edition in July last year: Rainbow Panda and the Firecracker Fiasco, so I was pleased to have this chance to revisit that world and see how things are going. This story is from the same stable and by the same author as the earlier one, but it's about a different character.

I don't know what the marketing plan is for this book but I was unable to find it anywhere. I could find no useful references to it online. It wasn't on B&N nor was it available at Amazon although they did list it, and I couldn't even find a cover image out there! Normally I take the cover image for a blog illustration directly from the ebook if I can, but in this case, the one on my blog is from Net Galley.

In this edition, we follow the antics of Silver Bunny, who is bored in Orange Bunny's taekwondo class. I used to date someone who pursued taekwondo, so this was interesting to me. Silver already knows the moves, but she isn't disciplined enough to understand that you not only have to know the moves, you also have to live them - to be able to put your heart and soul into them to make them real and worthy.

Silver would far rather be off surfing, and isn't even remotely deterred by the fact that last time she went surfing she was almost swallowed by a whale - that was just an accident, she protests! Eventually she and her friends come up with a plan to sneak off and do their own thing.

This book is illustrated, but none of the illustrations were visible in my Adobe Digital Editions reader - it was all text and white space, so I can't show any samples as I normally do. I saw the illustrations in the Kindle edition, but they were grey scale, which effectively prevents me from saying anything useful about them, except that I recall them being really quite good and very colorful in the earlier volume I read. I can only assume that the illustrations in this volume will be along the same lines. This doesn't mean the illustrations won't be as good, but do note that the illustrator here is not the same one who illustrated Rainbow Panda.

Teaming up with a couple of hamsters (you know what hamsters can be like, I'm sure - they're almost as bad as rats for mischief and exploration), Silver Bunny goes surfing; then they look up Rainbow Panda to get help building a secret fort where they can make a movie about taekwondo. There may be a dragon involved here, too.... The problem is that things don't turn out too well, and they discover a valuable lesson about the importance of proper learning and sound preparedness.

As in the previous volume I read in this series, this one also features quite an extensive glossary explaining aspects of Far Eastern culture, including the things depicted in this story. I recommend this young children's book.


Is A Worry Worrying You? by Ferida Wolff and Harriet May Savitz


Title: Is A Worry Worrying You?
Author: Ferida Wolff and Harriet May Savitz
Publisher: Tanglewood Press
Rating: WORTHY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review. The chance to read a new book is often reward aplenty!

Illustrated adroitly by Marie Letourneau.

This came to me in the form of a recommendation from a dear friend, and I thought, "Good call! I have to read that!" It's very much in the mold of an earlier volume I reviewed When the Anger Ogre Visits which is another reason I wanted to review this one. I was not disappointed! Note that the two books are not connected: they have different publishers, different writers, and different illustrators, although they do seem to have some aims in common, and the illustrations do share a certain style.

The story sets up realistic sources of worry, but frames them in rather absurdist and amusing scenarios which I think is a better approach than simply playing it straight. I mean who hasn't had a herd of elephants show up for tea? I know I have, and I didn't even have any lemonade on hand, so I made a peel for lemons and that worked out quite well....

A host of different sources of worry are explored and suggestions made, although I'm not sure that attempting to bribe your new teacher with an apple (or in this case bribing the new bear of a teacher with honey) is the wisest choice. I would have suggested a nice home-made welcome card. That's actually one of the joys of this book: it's so ebullient that you can't help but ponder the scenarios and try to come up with your own ideas. It's part of the fun, and an important skill to master.

I worry a lot about all sorts of things (the price of being a parent, and of working a demanding job), and I know it would have made a difference to my childhood had I been given excellent coping skills at an early age, so this is an inspired idea for a children's book - engrossing, amusing and practical to boot. Yes, I worry about that boot, too!

Marie Le Tourneau's illustrations are detailed and colorful. I adored the one where Uncle Herman comes to visit. The expression on the little girl's face is priceless and made me laugh out loud, for which I heartily thank the artist. The illustrations might be a bit scary at times, but overcoming the fear your worry induces is another important step towards conquering it. This illustrator has an image from this book on the opening page to her website. Her bio is well worth reading.

As a writer I always advocate that names mean something (or they ought to! You can't just pull a character name out of your aspirations and hope it works - they require some thought), but Marie Letourneau's name left me baffled. I had thought that Le Tourneau was French for something like "the tournament" or "the turn" (as in 'the rotation'), but when I ran it through a translator, it returned, "the runsat". I'm like "What?" I'm sorry but WHAT?

I ran that through that same website's dictionary, and it couldn't find the word! What's the point in giving a translation rendering a word that doesn't even appear in your own dictionary, pray tell?! Now there's an interesting name. The curious thing is that if you run it in reverse - and translate 'the runsat' from English to French - it gives 'Le tourneau', so at least it has consistency going for it if nothing else! Runsat is actually an app for Windows (Ian spits discreetly to one side) computers, but that's nothing to do with this.

Having hit that brick wall solidly, I was too dazed to chase after the writer's names, and I didn't need to because, playfully, they immediately suggested a 'meaning': Free the Wolf and Harriet May Save It! How charming is that? Thus delighted and mollified, I moved on, only to discover that Harriet May Savitz is no longer with us, which was disturbing to say the least. Her daughter evidently runs her website. Ferida Wolff has a site at the University of Southern Mississippi celebrating her work for goodness sakes! This whole name searching thing proved humbling, I can tell you! Maybe, sometimes, it's better not to ask? No, not really!

This is an entertaining and useful book, well-written, and nicely drawn and colored, and incorporating interesting ideas and good suggestions about how to cope with worries, and more importantly how to side-step a particular worry by adopting an improvised solution. These are all important methods to help children ease away woes and get them thinking about how to invent their own fixes, which is crucial. I can see this being of most use if parents discuss each scenario with their children - perhaps by exploring solutions to each problem before the book's own solution is revealed, and then discussing who came up with the best idea. No worries, mate!