Saturday, June 14, 2014

Anomal by Nukuharu


Title: Anomal
Author: Nukuharu (no website found)
Publisher: Gen Manga
Rating: WARTY!
Illustrated by Nukuharu


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

This is another line drawing manga written in English but expected to be read backwards (not the entire comic, but each individual page) as though it's in Japanese. I do not get that at all. As it happens, it appeared to make very little difference to the story flow if I started a page with the panel on the right on the one on the left!

The manga consists of several short stories, the first of which is the title story about some sort of god or demon who has eyes all over his body, and who donates (or perhaps more accurately, trades) a pair of them to a boy, who eventually decides that he's better off without them.

he story was flat and ultimately uninteresting except for the unintentional humor on page 16. There's a panel which has the text, "It is really pretty" (referring to the scenery), but all we get is a roughly shaded drawing of a hill! It's neither prettily drawn, nor is it a pretty view! I don't know if this was meant to be ironic or was just clueless.

The second story has a Japanese title, with the words 'Keiken Sosa' underneath. I have no idea what that means or if it's intended to be a phonetic translation of the Japanese. if so it tells me nothing. Maybe it's the Japanese equivalent of 'Sherlock Holmes', judged by the way the story goes. This story itself was nonsensical - it might be entertaining to young children (if you don't mind the slightly gay intimations) but it's not of interest to me.

The third story began in very much the same way: a Japanese title with what appears to be a phonetic translation which tells me nothing. I love Japanese culture, but that doesn't mean that I worship it or that think it's somehow especially spiritual. It certainly doesn't mean that I want to blunder around in it in the dark! The story of human eating demons was boring.

The fourth story was the same, and at this point I could not stand to read any more of this. The stories were entirely uninteresting and made no sense. Perhaps if I were steeped in Japanese tradition and folklore, which I am not, I would have enjoyed these more, but to me these were like children's fairy tales and were entirely unappealing to me.


Friday, June 13, 2014

An Etiquette Guide to the End Times by Maia Sepp


Title: An Etiquette Guide to the End Times
Author: Maia Sepp
Publisher: Maia Sepp through Draft 2 Digital
Rating: WORTHY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

This is a charming, witty, and engaging novella. Seriously, how can you not like a story with a title like that? (Note in passing that - according to wikipedia - a novel is something using over 40,000 words, a novella uses 17,500 to 40,000, a novelette 7,500 to 17,500, and a short story under 7,500). This one has 82 pages, but page one is the cover and there is some advertising in the back, meaning that the actual story occupies only 77 pages or so.

It's set in Canada at a point in the future where even the morons who claim global warming is fiction can no longer deny it. It begins with Olive O'Malley baking under the sun in the front yard with her neighbor and enjoying some fresh water - with ice no less - when some woman, obviously a member of The Core, visits asking if she would be interested in migrating her etiquette blog to radio. Olive is disinclined to acquiesce to her request, so to say, and the woman departs, whereupon Olive discovers that the Internet has finally failed. It's yet another step in the obsolescence of technology in a disintegrating world.

Of what use is her blog if she can't blog? Why didn't the Core woman tell her that the Internet was finally going down? Judged by the veiled threats she got, and gets again from another member of the Core, Olive isn't going to be granted much choice about joining them, but her priority is recovering her grandfather, Fred. Even though she had a thorny relationship with him, he's important to her and she misses him and agonizes over his fate; then comes a risky opportunity for Olive to turn things around, to side-step the Core, bring Fred home, and garner for herself a little bit of self-determination. But what is the real cost of this going to be?

I liked this story very much, although it felt a bit too short and left things a bit loose at the end. That's not always a bad thing and I'd rather have that, than have a novel which doesn't know when to say goodnight and leave. I loved the easy relationship Olive had with her neighbor - a woman with whom a relationship would probably never have developed had it not been for the impoverished and rationed circumstances under which they're both now forced to live. I could stand to read a lot more about these two.

A remarkable story, an easy read, and an engaging tale. Some YA writers could stand to learn a bit about how women should be portrayed from reading Maia Sepp's writing. I recommend this novella unreservedly.


Thursday, June 12, 2014

The Bunker by Joshua Hale Fialkov


Title: The Bunker
Author: Joshua Hale Fialkov
Publisher: Oni Press
Rating: WARTY!
Illustration, coloring, lettering by Joe Infurnari


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

I just could not get into this book despite it being a really interesting premise. The story lost me (several times) and the art work seemed more like preliminary sketches than final copy. Often the text was hard to read since it was in script form.

The story is that five college friends decide to bury a time capsule which they will meet and dig up at some point in the future. They pick a spot in the forest, and start digging only to uncover a buried bunker which has their names (that is, all but one of them) stenciled on it. They enter it and discover letters supposedly written by themselves from the future, warning each of them of the part they will play in destroying the planet.

This premise (of the destruction of most of the human population of Earth) struck me as being far-fetched even for a comic book, and the execution wasn't really well done. The dialog seemed wrong, and their actions didn't seem realistic to me given what they then knew. Either that or these five have to be the dumbest college grads ever. There was one part where a couple got totally hung up on the infidelity of one of them, and I couldn't see that being such a big deal given the earth-shattering discovery they'd just become party to! yes, I know that people do the weirdest things, but this seemed to be going down the wrong road to me, for this kind of story.

I'm normally pretty good at picking out graphic novels that I end up liking, but I can't recommend this one.


Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Starhawk by Jack McDevitt


Title: Starhawk
Author: Jack McDevitt
Publisher: Penguin
Rating: WARTY!

I'm a huge fan of Jack McDevitt. For me he's the best space-travel sci-fi author out there. He has two series (as well as many stand-alones and a plethora of short stories), both of which are set in the same universe, but centuries apart. The earlier one is the Priscilla Hutchins series, the later one is the Alex Benedict series. When I read the last of the Hutchins series prior to this, I thought it was over because he had aged Hutchins, and pretty much retired her from piloting, so imagine the thrill I got when I saw this one on the library shelf! What he's done is written a prequel, taking us back to before Hutchins became a respected and seasoned space pilot - to the point where she was training to be one. This is a good move but it’s hard to see this going anywhere else because he's pretty much Ourobourosed himself now!

This novel starts with a false emergency on board the Copperhead, her small training ship, captained by Jake Loomis. It quickly moves on to a real emergency: a cargo ship that has been roped into a passenger transport role taking a dozen or so school girls from the Middle East on a space trip as a reward for their performance in a science contest. Unfortunately, an anti-terraforming group placed a bomb on the ship, designed to take out the engines. They did not expect there to be any extraneous passengers since this is a cargo ship, and no one was supposed to get hurt. Now it’s damaged and needs to have the passengers taken off since it's in a decaying orbit.

The Copperhead is the closest ship, but its capacity is too small to sustain that many people for any great length of time. The cargo ship could sustain them, but its orbit is decaying too fast, so they have to secure the passengers and hang in there until a larger ship can reach them. The Copperhead can safe-harbor the passengers until the other ship gets there - if it gets there soon enough - but there is a shortfall in supply and demand, and the pilot of the cargo ship ends up killing himself in order to spare enough oxygen to sustain the rest of them long enough for the other ship to come in and complete the rescue.

I have several problems with this. The first is that the problem with the cargo ship isn't that it is unlivable, but that it’s in a decaying orbit, so no one can stay aboard until help arrives. My problem with this is that never once is it considered a possibility that they could use the Copperhead to boost the orbit of the cargo craft. This is done all the time with the International Space Station by visiting transport craft, so I don’t get what the problem was here. This is just bad writing. It would have been easy enough to simply have had someone raise that possibility and then for it to be dismissed for reason 'X'.

The second issue was the dwindling oxygen. McDevitt writes it like the ship has a fixed supply and once that's gone, you're screwed, but this is bullshit! Several hundred years into the future, and they don’t have the same CO2 recycling that we already have today in spacecraft today? So this rescue was a great start to the story, but it lacks all credibility if you look at it too closely. The offshoot of this is that Hutchins gets her pilot's license and Loomis, who has serious survivor guilt, retires. It turns out that the bomber, a guy called Leon, is an old friend of his - someone both he and Hutchins had spoken to not that long before. The bomber tracks down Loomis at his remote Virginia cabin and apologizes to him, but Loomis fails to call it in. That's two big strikes against him now. I have a feeling he's being set up to do something brave and fatal later in the story.

The smaller oxygen issue is that no effort seems to be made to conserve what they have. Everyone could have lain down and relaxed (as much as was humanly possible in the circumstances), and they could also have explored the possibility of bringing air over from the crippled cargo ship until that ship dropped too low in its orbit, but this wasn't even considered. Again it’s bad writing. This possibility could have at least been raised if only to then be dismissed in some way, but to not even bring it up doesn’t speak well of an author, because you know readers are going to ask "Why not?" so you might as well deal with it up front. Fortunately, McDevitt writes such good stories overall that I'm willing to forgive him for his trespasses against solid writing on most cases.

Hutchins goes down to Earth to visit her mom, but she gets called in by Kosmik, the space transportation corporation to which she applied for a piloting job. They hired her, but now they need her to start early because something came up. The story continues from there.

I have to say that this is without doubt the weakest novel Jack McDevitt has ever written. It had the potential to be great, but it ended-up being a sad and amateurish story that went nowhere, had no plot, and was one in which even the main character, Priscilla Hutchins ("Hutch"), was boring, which is a travesty. It’s billed on the cover as "a Priscilla Hutchins novel" but it’s as much about Jake Loomis, her mentor, as it is about her. I can’t remember the last novel I read where the star of the series was forced to take a back-seat to another character!

Jake is offered up as the experienced master adventurer, and she's relegated to being the little lady exploring her juvenile "love" interest, and conducting space station tours like she's a teenage volunteer. It’s pathetic. Way to trash your main character, Jack! While Captain Jake is off investigating the most interesting thing - the rogue planet - Hutch is relegated to chauffeuring a politician who originally wanted to cut-back the space program, but who has now changed his mind.

The story isn't at all like McDevitt's other adventures in this series, where there's action, big discoveries, adventure, fun and new things to learn. It’s more like a dear diary of trivia, a kind of 'what I did during the summer holidays' essay where all you did was hang around home, sunbathe, and watch TV. There's a rogue planet, but instead of this being the centerpiece of the novel, it's tacked on at the end almost as though McDevitt realized he had blown this story, and was now desperately forcing this on the ass-end, to try and get some attention when it wiggles.

One of Hutch's biggest problems (other than being trivialized, that is) is her relationship with Cal, an actor who apparently falls into insta-love with her, and she finds nothing wrong with this. She encourages and entertains him, even though she doesn’t feel the same way, and even though his entire attraction to her is painfully and obviously based solely on his perception that she's "beautiful". He never has a word to say about her skills and abilities, her career choices, her mind, her smarts, her decency, the kind of person she is. All he can ever say about her relates directly back to him: how beautiful he thinks she is, and how much he misses her. It's sick and pathetic. The fact that she finds nothing wrong with this at all reeks of bullshit, and makes me think only of how dumb and blind she is. It's written like a young adult novel and frankly, if I'd read this one first, before any of his others in this series, I never would have gone on to read the series.

One odd and striking thing is the conversations which Hutch and Cal have. It’s not just theirs, but it is the most noticeable to me when they converse. When you're talking with someone, you don’t normally say their name every time it’s your turn to speak, but that's pretty much what we tend to get with conversations here, and it’s particularly noticeable between Hutch and Cal. It just feels really false. I don't think McDevitt knows how to write romance.

Another odd thing is McDevitt's addiction to depicting, in tedious detail, everything that these people do during their trips through what he calls "Barber space". This is the 'transition dimension' between the start and end of an interstellar jump. This Barber space trip can take a month or more and is a proportional function of how many light years away the destination is. There's no explanation offered as to why this is so.

Inside Barber space it looks like the spacecraft is enveloped in fog, and not moving - or hardly moving. Ships have been lost in this space, but other than that, it’s travel time, where (subjective) days and nights pass, and people have to find things to do - like watching movies, or reading, or playing games - to pass the time. The problem is that McDevitt seems obsessed with detailing every novel or movie Hutch (and everyone else) reads or watches during this time. It’s boring, but this is something he does in every novel in this series (and in his Benedict series). It’s not confined just to this one, and it rarely does a thing to advance the story.


I hate to say this, but I cannot recommend this novel. It's nothing like up to the standard of the rest of this series, and I have to question why it was even written. I do recommend the others in this series, however.


Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Poisoned Honey by Beatrice Gormley


Title: Poisoned Honey
Author: Beatrice Gormley
Publisher: Alfred A Knopf
Rating: worthy

This is a novel based on the Biblical New Testament fiction of Mary Magdalene. Unfortunately, it Anglicizes the names way too much so we don't really get a full taste of Middle East flavor even as we're delivered a lot of Hebrew culture and introduced to Hebrew habits and traditions. That struck me as rather odd. Fortunately, the author doesn't buy into every cliché surrounding Mary Magdalene: that she was for example, a prostitute, but we do get an interesting perspective on her supposed seven devils. That itself is another NT fiction. It's mentioned only in Luke, a rip-off gospel, and in the forged portion of Mark. This campaign of vilification against Mary M. is precisely why she's so interesting a person.

Mary Magdalene is a conflation of several different people portrayed in Biblical fiction. There's a good article about her in wikipedia. She often rated as the second most important woman in the NT after Mary, the mother of Jesus, but this is dishonest because Jesus's purported mother contributed nothing. Indeed, Jesus himself rebuked her thereby breaking the sixth commandment ("Woman, what have I to do with thee?" John 2:4). This would indicate that he was openly stating that he was not actually her son. We hear nothing of this Mary except in a couple of places, whereas Mary Magdalene is mentioned more than any other woman, so no, she wasn't second to Mary, but took precedence over her by far.

Now what do I mean by Biblical fiction? Well as far as I am concerned, the Biblical Old Testament is at best a poor record of Hebrew ancient history, but it's been larded-up with fantasy and fiction about the doings of gods, for which there is neither evidence nor support. The New Testament is even worse, since as far as I am concerned, it’s not even Jewish history - it’s all fiction. Yes, Jesus (or rather the actual Hebrew name, Yeshua, or some variant thereof) was a common name in that era, as was Mary (or Miri or whatever), and there may well have been a rabbi named Yeshua, but that doesn’t mean that rabbi was a god, or a manifestation of a god, or a son of a god. I don’t buy that at all because there is no reason to.

There may even have been a Yeshua who was crucified, but that doesn’t prove that he got up out of the grave three days later. I'm not one of these idiots who tediously parrots that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". I mean, I find it extraordinary that the sun is a massive ball of nuclear fusion some 93 million miles away, but that doesn’t mean I require extraordinary evidence to accept that as the truth. No, I merely require sufficient evidence, for this or any other claim that’s not self-evident. Science provides sufficient evidence (and then some). Scientific evidence fits. It makes sense. Religion cannot offer any such evidence for its claims, which is why I don’t buy them. People back then were scientifically ignorant and blinded by religious superstition, and as far as I'm concerned, this accounts adequately for everything that's told in the Bible where it impinges upon, references, or calls for the supernatural.

So why did I choose to read this? To me this is just one more Biblical-style fiction, every bit as valid or invalid as the original. These messianic stories are neither unique nor original to the Bible. There have been scores of "saviors" or "messiahs" throughout history, and across cultures: people who were supposedly born of a virgin, who left home, who rallied people around them, who brought a "new" message, who won followers, who were killed and who supposedly were resurrected and taken up into "heaven". Lord Raglan (4th Baron Raglan) did a study of this archetype, which is worth a look. I don’t believe in any of them and there is no reason to make an exception just because there's yet another such story in the Bible. However, sometimes these stories can be told well, made intriguing, even made to make sense, so I was merely curious as to what Gormley did with this.

Mary is a character who has intrigued me ever since I first learned of her. Indeed, I find her far more fascinating than the main character of the NT! This is why I have an idea on the back burner for a novel about her which will explore why so many people, even in Biblical times, sought to trash her character. When I had the opportunity to buy this one in the Library store (wherein they sell-off discontinued library books at an amazing discount!) I snapped it up.

The author consistently refers to her main character as Mari. This young teen is given a vision of her place in life and is convinced that she should submit to an arranged marriage. Unfortunately, the charming guy she thinks she's getting dies prematurely, and instead she's given to an old curmudgeon who doesn't love her. He already has a dominant woman in his life who spares no mercy for Mari, making her life a misery. When the old guy finally kicks the bucket, Mari is glad and is able to leave the house and not return.

The problem is that during her time in this miserable marriage, Mari becomes slowly seduced by demons without even realizing it's happening to her. Of course, the man who frees her from this possession becomes the man she devotes her life to supporting, and to following and learning from him.

Not the best or most original story in the world, and nothing like the idea I have for a novel, but still this novel is worth a read if you're into tales told well or Biblical fiction.


Monday, June 9, 2014

My Soon to be Sex Life by Judith Tewes


Title: My Soon to be Sex Life (I was unable to locate this novel or this author at Barnes & Noble or at Amazon)
Author: Judith Tewes
Publisher: Bloomsbury
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

This is the novel that killed my Kindle! Not really. The Kindle is ancient, but coincidentally, it seems to have gone on the fritz as I finished the very last screen (I assume it's the last screen - I couldn't progress beyond it because of aforesaid problem). If that was the last screen it was a rather odd ending.

This is the story of Charlotte Webb (yes named after that novel) a young teen who lives with her mom, and who is feisty and amusing, but who learns that she is to be dispatched to live with "that rat bastard who made her [mom's] childhood a living hell" when her mom has to go into rehab. Where she gets that idea about her grandfather is never explained, nor does it make any sense, because once she moves in with him, he's fine and they get on like a house on fire.

Charlotte also has a plan (for reasons unspecified) and an urgent deadline (again for reasons unspecified) to lose her virginity, and has created a list of possible "devirginizer" guys for this purpose. This girl needs someone to sit down and talk with her.

Charlie isn't a believer, bless her soul(!) but her best friend Rachel, whom she calls Roach, is a product of a supposedly Christian family, although they seem to espouse few Christian principles. Roach is a borderline kleptomaniac, for example.

This novel fails the Bechdel-Wallace test unashamedly since its entire focus is that of getting laid and the two main characters are both heterosexual, so what else would they talk about? Like it or not, the Bechdel-Wallace test is valid but limited in its scope.

I was ready to rate this novel as a worthy read based on Charlie and Roach, and their interaction, but there were some real issues with the writing which bothered me too much to let slide. At one point, for example, Grace (Charlie's single mom's best friend) is informed by Charlie's mom that Charlie has intimated that they're lesbians, to which Grace responds (referencing her beau Ian): " He's always hinting he'd be up for a little three-way action."

I'm sure he would, but no lesbian would be up for it unless Ian was a woman and the lesbians were very free and easy in their approach to fidelity. A pair of bisexual women might be interested, but that's a different thing. 'Bisexual' and 'lesbian' are not the same persuasion. What bothers me about this is not that a character made a bad joke, but that the author doesn't bother to have one of the other characters, Charlie in particular, correct this misunderstanding. This makes me think that the author either doesn't understand what lesbianism really means, or she doesn't care, which is sad, especially given that she's a woman. Characters are like everyday people: they can be as perverse, as gross, as politically incorrect, as wrong-headed, as obnoxious, as biased, as bigoted,as racist, and as whatever as people in real life can be, but, just as in real life, that doesn't mean they should be allowed to get away with it!

There were other issues with the review copy I had. Once again it appeared to be completely un-formatted for the Kindle screen. There were odd gaps in the text, and some words were paired with others without the usual space between the two. Any spell checker, even Microsoft's, would have caught this kind of error. I don't know if they have some software which is supposed to automatically morph the text into Kindle format, but whichever system it was that they employed, it failed here.

Moreover, there were other errors which can only be blamed on author inattention and editorial incompetence, such as at 51% in, near the end of chapter fifteen, where the author writes, "...John said, compiling with the conversation shift...". I think 'compiling' should have been 'complying'. No spell-checker is going to catch that. That's something which even a beta reader should catch, and for missing which, an editor has no excuse.

The problems came in all shapes and sizes. One was with the telegraphing of the true nature of a character named Morgan, who was such an obvious red-herring that even I saw it coming, which says something! Another problem is in the use of poor grammar, such as employing the term "her and Preston" (at 93% in for example) when it ought to be "she and Preston". You can see this for yourself if you put it into a sentence. Suppose, for example, that it read, "Her and Preston went to the cafe." This breaks down to "Preston went to the cafe" (which is fine) and "Her went to the cafe" which is clearly wrong. This is different from a use which might read, for example, "This affected both her and Preston" which is not the smoothest of reads, but which isn't technically incorrect.

At 57% in, the word 'grizzle' was used. This word means gray, or 'devoid of hue', but it wasn't used in that context. It was used where 'gristle' ought to have been used instead. Again, an editor ought to have caught this. At 89% in, the line "far from the maddening crowd" was used. This was presumably a reference to the Thomas Hardy novel Far From the Madding Crowd, but as you see, the title does not include the word 'maddening'. 'Madding' means moving around agitatedly. It does not mean anger-inducing. If the author had not made other mistakes of understanding, I might have let this go, but it seems like this is a mistake, also.

That said, the novel was very well-written in general terms, particularly so with regard to establishing, defining, and portraying the two main characters, both of whom I loved, but I cannot rate this novel as a worthy read based on that when there are so many other issues. Perhaps the worst of these was the bungled YA romance, which seemed idiotic at worst, and farcical at best. This was a central relationship, but instead of something warm and realistic which would have fit right into the relationship already established between Charlie and Roach, yet again we were asked to swallow a standard YA trope male with hair in his eyes and rippling muscles - like there is absolutely no other type of guy whatsoever which could possibly be worth liking. How insulting can you get? Charlie deserved better than this.

The relationship doesn't even work. There is no friendship here, no getting to know one another. Instead, it's instant lust, which cheapens and demeans the whole thing. Worse than this, however, is the fact that a resilient, strong, funny, and smart character became mushy Jell-O once this guy entered her life, and particularly if he was anywhere near her. I'm sorry but you just trashed your main character for me, and made me lose all respect for her. This was a character I really liked (despite her idiotic devirginizing plan), and then suddenly, what's to like? She became rather repulsive if not detestable. So much for a strong female character. I cannot honestly recommend this novel.


Sunday, June 8, 2014

Cameo by Tanille Edwards


Title: Cameo
Author: Tanille Edwards (No website available)
Publisher: Harper Collins
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

Tanille Edwards is one of these people who likes to go by only one name, like Madonna Ciccone and Rihanna Fenty, but her novel is isn't copyrighted to Tanille, it's to Tanille Edwards, so evidently this lone word actually isn't her name. This novel has a fifteen-page prologue (pretentiously titled a 'prelude' here) and a one paragraph first chapter! I skipped the prologue as usual. I routinely do this and I rarely have to go back and read it because I missed something. That ought to tell you how worthless prologues are. If it's worth the telling, it's worth calling it chapter one. Prologues are so thrift store drop-off box....

You can also skip chapter one in this novel, since nothing happens until chapter two, and then the story is like listening to a four-year-old explain how she managed to spill the entire box of cereal all over everything. It's all talk all the time.

The main character's name is Nia no doubt short for 'Nia sighted' since she evidently has no life whatsoever except insofar as she's an accessory to guys' wardrobes, which seem to malfunction in Nia's case. She can't relate to guys except in a hostile manner, so despite the writing, she actually managed to interest me a little. Unfortunately, the novel is essentially one long conversation, with almost no descriptive writing or scene setting or mood setting, and the conversation is almost always about guys and is sorrowfully genderist to boot. How boring can you get? If a guy wrote this novel but with reversed genders, he would be pilloried for it and rightly so.

Chapter three begins with Nia's continuing dysfunctional validation of herself as a nobody unless in reference to some boy somewhere. On page 29 there is an utterly bizarre sentence: "Sufficed it to say that was the last I playing the CD that night." Seriously? Was there no editor on this novel? If there was, he or she needs to be fired for letting this kind of thing get through - not just that sentence, but the entire novel (or at least, the first six chapters which is as much as I could stand to wade through).

It's not such much that there's nothing of interest going on, but that there's literally nothing at all going on. It's like reading some thirteen-year-old's diary - the diary of a dreary thirteen year old to whom nothing happens and who has no imagination and no interests other than endlessly gabbling about, ruminating upon, speculating over, and drooling because of boys. It's tedious and I found myself skipping more and more pages of this stuff until at chapter six I decided to skip the entire rest of the novel. I could not stand to read any more.

Tanille Edwards is a singer, but she is not a writer. You can hear her perform on You Tube. I cannot in good conscience recommend this novel.


Saturday, June 7, 2014

The Magician's Doll by M L Roble


Title: The Magician's Doll
Author: M L Roble
Publisher: Harper
Rating: WARTY!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

erratum
p10 "So you think you're mother's a freak too?" should be "So you think your mother's a freak too?"

This is the story of Natalie Bristol desperately hurrying home from school to try and hide the 'Psychic' sign her mother has put up in the front yard, before her school 'friends' see it and make fun of her. She fails. It's the story of Natalie, who has unpredictable blackouts, during one of which a mysterious voice warns her that, "They are stronger. They are coming. They will arrive." She desperately wants to control these episodes, but she cannot.

It's the story of a young girl who has a thrill-a-minute day at the circus until the magician's show, where the great Beausoleil brings a doll onto the stage, and invites Natalie to prove to herself that it's just a doll. After she does so, the doll appears to come to life and when it touches Natalie's hand, she feels her life energy leaving her and entering the doll, summoning yet another blackout.

When she awakens, her mother is talking to Beausoleil, and the two obviously know each other. He's desperately trying to persuade her to help him, and warning her as a friend that she isn't safe no matter how well she tries to hide herself and her daughter. But no one is telling Natalie what the heck is going on, and her friend Phillip is behaving more and more like he will do something rash in pursuit of his quest to discover what really happened to his father.

I have to say that page 72 is hilarious. I don't know what it was exactly, but I laughed out loud at that. Maybe I was recovering after a stressful day at work, but I could imagine exactly how that incident went down and how it looked. Louisa's comments slayed me! But then Louisa is a rather special girl in an unexpected way, now, isn't she?

The next page, unfortunately, was much less thrilling. It employed the tired old trope of the young protagonist not being told anything. There is no excuse for this, and I know it's a standard trope in YA fiction: the youthful hero-to-be growing up in ignorance, but when your writing demonstrates that the only tool you have to build up tension is to have your characters retreat into irrational, nonsensical, or even dangerous behaviors, it simply doesn't work. It only annoys readers, and it makes me personally reach a point where I am thinking that this had better be dealt with soon or I'm outta here! I'm all for a bit of mystery and intrigue, but when it's so artificial as to drop you right out of suspension of disbelief and into ascension of annoyance, it's nothing more than bad writing.

Chapter twelve doesn't get any better either as it progresses (or rather regresses), because even now the three kids have seen a part of what they're up against, Natalie's mom is all, "We'll talk tomorrow'. I frankly want to kick her in her obsessive, secretive, lethargic, lousy-parenting ass at that point. Yes, I know this is written for a younger age range than mine, but children are only dumb if they're persistently treated that way. They will see through this.

It was parental stupidity which precipitated the sorry events of chapter twelve, and still they seem blindly incapable of learning from it. I know there really are people who are dumb and thoughtless, and who are poor parents, but this seems to be a raging pandemic in YA literature and it needs to stop, because in the end it reflects very badly on the writer and offers a grave disservice to the reader.

Unfortunately things did not pick up from there either, because even as events actually became more exciting (as I learned more about Natalie and Phillip's "gifts"), I also became more irritated. Natalie's grandmother's habit of endlessly saying "my dear" really got my skin crawling after a while, and then the school bully problem cropped up again and Natalie's friend Phillip comes out with this appallingly genderist comment: "...three against two and one is a girl...".

Excuse me? She's a girl and therefore she's somehow not a full person? I decided right there that point that this novel now had five chapters to turn itself around otherwise I was ditching it. There is no excuse for dissing girls in YA stories. Women have enough crap to deal with without them being demeaned and down-graded at such a young age for no other reason than that they're "a girl". I can't believe that a writer who is of the same gender would demean her major character like this. It's inexcusable. What kind of a message is she sending to young girls?

This genderism is further amplified later when Phillip's mom sews together a jacket for Phillip and for Natalie. Phillip gets something that looks like an army jacket, with lots of pockets, whereas Natalie gets one with ruffles down the front and on the sleeves? Why? Because she's a girl and doesn't deserve to be treated the same and given the same options as a boy? Of course, Natalie loves her jacket because she's a girl and it's "dainty"! If only she'd go sit in the corner and be quiet until she's old enough to be barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen, everything would be fine, wouldn't it? Then we could have a story about manly Phillip and we wouldn't have to bother ourselves any more with The Nat, that useless girl.

This took place as Natalie and Phillip were coming into their "gifts", and undergoing training to learn how to use the gifts, yet neither one of them thinks of employing those powers to fend off the three bullies. This is a betrayal of the characters and is bad writing. For two or three days, these two have had it drilled into them that they must practice and use their powers, and control them and take charge of them, yet the last thing either of them thinks of is using a power and taking charge of this situation and controlling it? Yes, eventually, Natalie realizes this, but it just makes your characters look dumb and slow when you do this.

This situation is actually even worse because it portrays Natalie and Phillip running around in the open, unprotected, right after their parents have effectively grounded them, telling them that they cannot be running round out in the open and unprotected because they're in grave danger! The plotting here makes no logical sense at all.

So I read five chapters more and things did not improve and I called this one off. There were multiple problems with it. In addition to the one grammatical error I mentioned in the erratum, there were several issues of really awkward sentences. For example, on page 151 I read: "It's going to start to get dark soon." which is not really an error as such, but it's definitely an awkward sentence. Page 156 had another one in this vein: "A footfall tapped on the wood of the tree." It just sounds weird, is all. This novel fails the so-called Bechdel test, too. The first time that Louisa and Natalie talk to each other with no one else present, the only thing they can find to talk about is Phillip! It's sad but true!

So while this novel might appeal to undiscriminating children at the younger end of the YA scale and to pre-young adults, it doesn't have what it takes to pass my muster. It's poorly written, it's genderist, and there are plot holes galore, all of which could have been avoided. Once again this is proof that going the Big Publishing™ route is no guarantee that you'll get a decent editor.


Friday, June 6, 2014

The Search for an Abortionist by Nancy Howell Lee


Title: The Search for an Abortionist
Author: Nancy Howell Lee (no website found)
Publisher: Open Road Media
(Originally published 1969 by the University of Chicago Press)
Rating: WORTHY!

Erratum:
Author Nancy Howell's "Preface, 2014" has an error in the second line, where the word 'radical' is repeated.

In fictional works, I routinely skip the introduction or prologue or whatever the writer chooses to name it, because there is no place for such a thing in a novel. In non-fiction (which I do not review often on my blog) I do tend to read such things, and so I have to say that I wasn't impressed with Mark Crispin Miller's introductory rant in which he posits unsubstantiated claims of stealthy censorship. Yes, he may be right. In fact, I don't doubt that there have been cases where novels and other works have ended up buried for one reason or another, but whether there is a huge number of such episodes. and whether the effort to suppress written works is active, and/or concerted, and/or widespread remains only an hypothesis with no supportive evidence offered here, notwithstanding the conviction of those who declare it to be so.

Moreover, I can see how these claims might have had some basis in fact in the past, when Big Publishing™ ruled the roost, but that case no longer holds. We live in the era of the Internet where pretty much anyone (assuming that they have access of course) can post pretty much anything. Even those who cannot afford a computer can use machines in their local library. There is no censorship here; neither government nor Big Publishing™ exercise any control over this. No matter how true or otherwise these assertions may have been historically, in an era of easy and free self-publishing, claims such as those which Miller makes have no foundation upon which to secure a sound lodging.

As far as the book itself goes, it's not really for reading, it's much more of reference, since it's less like a textbook than it is a scientific study (which is what it actually is, of course!). However, that should not prevent anyone from reading the salient points in this, because that's the real value of this book, and that's the topic on which people need to be educated, and this book will educate you to the reality of life when abortion was common but not legal and was definitely not safe.

Religious fanatics have been trying to drag us back to the stone age for a long time (before that, they were trying to keep us in the stone age!). Their absurd assault on a woman's reproductive rights isn't anything new. They've been assaulting women in one way or another since the Bible was first invented by blinkered, cantankerous old men. The problem is that the present wave of professional oppressionists is just as blinkered. They cannot see that you cannot keep people in ignorance of contraception, and prevent people from obtaining it, and then not expect that unwanted pregnancies will be one serious result, yet this is precisely what these morons do.

They are also hypocites. They claim to live by Biblical principles yet depart from them as soon as they become even slightly inconvenient. The Biblical god quite evidently had no problem aborting literally thousands of people whether they were babies or not. That god quite clearly had no respect for life. The Bible definition of life was when the baby took its first breath after departing the vaginal canal and thereby inhaled the spirit of this god. The Bible most certainly does not define life as beginning at conception any more than we do today. If we did, then everyone would be nine months older. Your birthday is the day you are born, not the day you're conceived. These people are morons.

But true as that may be, that's not the premise of this book. The premise is that people will get abortions whether they are legal or not, and will suffer far worse if they are illegal than if they are legal. Women are not dumb, nor are they as cowardly as the anti-abortion psychos, and they will take care of their needs whether Biblically sanctioned or not. The first step to understanding what this means in the real world is to read this book and thereby arm yourself against the propaganda and outright lies put out by those who are supposed to adhere to the injunction not to bear false witness.


Thursday, June 5, 2014

Plain Kate by Erin Bow


Title: Plain Kate
Author: Erin Bow
Publisher: Arthur Levine
Rating: worthy

This is Erin Bow's first novel. I already reviewed her second, Sorrow's Knot and liked it well enough to want to read more by her. There may be a third, Wood Angel but Bow's website is particularly obtuse, so I couldn't tell if this is something upcoming, or a different name for something I've mentioned or what!

The author made me realize (see comment below) that I had made a really unforgiveable mistake in confusing Erin Bow with Erin Bowman who wrote an appallingly bad dystopian trilogy, the first two volumes of which I will review before too long. The only reason I actually picked up those volumes was that I thought it was this same author! Ugh! How could I make such an appallingly brain-dead mistake!!! I am so relieved this isn't the same author. So a sincere thanks to Erin Bow for setting me straight. Now I can continue to read her material without shuddering!

Plain Kate is a fairy tale about young girl who works with her father Poitr, who is a wood carver, in an obscure European village (judged by their names, this was in Russia) several centuries ago. Katerina Svetlana is, according to their neighbor, the butcher, "plain as a stick", but at carving, she's "better than any apprentice and as good as many a master". She becomes Kate Carver, or just plain Kate, and unfortunately, her life is about to fall apart at the joints.

A sickness, considered by most to have been visited upon them by a witch, takes her father. The carver's guild seizes his shop and tools, and Kate is forced to live in the stall her father maintained (why I don't know) in the market square, where a drawer in a cabinet is large enough to serve as her home and bed. One night she hears mewing, and adopts the three kittens she discovers living in a drawer above her. In time, two of the cats adopt other owners, but the big grey, Taggle, stays with Kate.

Kate is shunned by most of the village's population, many of whom consider her to be a witch because of her mis-matched eyes. She scrapes a hard living by carving objarka (amulets offering protection against witchery, and which clearly do not work!) and selling them when she can. She's also favored somewhat by a milkmaid and the baker, so she can get some food and drink. But her life is about to take a turn for the worse, as Linay, an albino who is also a witch, comes to town and takes a shine to her - or rather to her shadow.

I didn't appreciate Bow's picking on albinos here. It makes no sense to the story, either - that Kate is a pariah because of her eyes, but the albino has no trouble with the locals at all? He offers to buy her shadow in return for granting her deepest wish, but she refuses him, even as she takes his business: carving a new bow for his violin. Erin Bow seems to like writing stories which feature namesakes. In Sorrow's Knot she writes about native Americans, who are associated with bows, and here, she has a character carve a bow.

Linay won't take no for an answer, and he starts turning people against her even more so than before, so eventually she feels she has no choice but to make the deal. She gets what she needs to leave town and strike out on her own, whilst Linay gets her shadow. What the significance of this is, is never really made clear, but what it entails is her shadow slowly fading, becoming ever more nebulous, dwindling away until it's gone entirely. Linay advises her to find a home before that happens.

Kate discovers that her deepest wish was apparently to have her cat talk to her. Taggle starts speaking, which is inconvenient at best and hilarious at worst! He proves to be one of the best and most amusing parts of the novel with his little feline needs, observations, and wishes, and while I appreciated an animal companion which wasn't nauseating and embarrassing or irrelevant, it made no sense to me that this was her deepest wish, given that she'd lost her father not long before; however, Bow does a really good job of personifying the cat to my mind.

The baker advises her to join the travelers (Romany people who occasionally visit the town), if she wants to leave town and be secure, and he affords her an introduction. She's taken in conditionally, with a proviso that a final decision will be made when they reach the big city towards which they travel, but it gets worse. Within the clan, Kate is befriend by Drina, the daughter of one of the most paranoid guys in this Romany group. The two of them spend a lot of time together, sharing chores, and inevitably Drina learns that Taggle, not the most discreet of guys, can talk, and that Kate has sold her shadow. She resolves to help Kate erase the witch's curse and get her shadow back.

When they arrive at the city and the two of them go into town, Kate's plan is to try and sell objarka and earn some money (and thereby her place in the clan). Drina, meanwhile, plans on trying to find a witch who knows how to undo the curse. This brings trouble down big time as people corner Drina, claiming she's a witch. Kate has to buy their freedom with the money she's earned, and she flees back to the camp, with the badly injured Drina in tow. Now she lives in terror of being burned as a witch by the very people with whom she sought to make a home and a life.

The ending to this story is quite as good as the beginning, so I recommend it. It's well-written, particularly Taggle, and has a good ending, if not a traditionally good one. I'd like to have seen a bit more from this tale, but one cannot have everything, can one? Where would one keep it?


Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Valkyrie Rising by Ingrid Paulson


Title: Valkyrie Rising
Author: Ingrid Paulson
Publisher: Harper Collins
Rating: WARTY!

Not to be confused with Ana Meadows The Stolen Valkyrie: Rising Phoenix, in many ways this is a standard trope urban fantasy: a teen girl has powers of which she's initially unaware, no one will tell her anything even when it's to her and their best advantage to tell her, she has two guys in tow, she's separated from parental oversight and control, and so on. In one other way, it’s a bit different, because unlike far too many YA novels these days, it doesn’t feature werewolves, or vampires, or angels. That doesn't necessarily mean that it’s any good!

This novel is odd in that it features a kind of double-triangle. Sixteen-year-old Elsa Overholt is the main character, and her older brother Graham is in tow, not in an incestuous way, but in an overprotective way. His best friend Tucker (seriously) has had zero interest in her, but now is suddenly all over her, but also simultaneously backing away from her because of Graham. The "flirtation" between him and Elsa is so forced and fake as to be embarrassing if it were not so fingernails-on-a-chalk-board irritatingly cheesy.

Normally Graham has been the one protecting her from guys, but now it seems that she has to protect him from Valkyries. Given that Valkyries are creatures from Norse mythology who are supposed to scour battlefields and transport those who are worthy to Valhalla (kinda like the Islamic mythology of seventy virgins and whatever), their habit of picking up hot eighteen-year-olds in bars seems a bit like slumming, but those teen boys are never seen again.

So for part of her summer, Elsa gets to travel to grandma's house in Norway. Graham comes along too, and inexplicably, so does Tucker. Fortunately for Elsa, everyone in Norway speaks perfect English - even in a remote and tiny fishing village, so there's never as language problem. Elsa claims she speaks hardly any Norwegian and then goes on to show us what a foul liar she is by showing that she more or less understands every single thing anyone says in her vicinity, so there are never any language problems.

It's no spoiler - indeed it’s patently obvious from book title, blurb and first couple of chapters that Elsa is - what Elsa? - a Valkyrie, as is her grandmother, who won't tell Elsa a fricking thing. This is where we discover that Elsa is a complete and utter moron. She obsesses over getting her grandmother to tell her exactly what’s going on, yet the very first time her grandmother comes even close to doing so, Elsa bolts for the door the first chance she gets. Does she want to know or not? And why is the author writing this so badly? I guess Elsa can’t help us with that either!

There is no mystery here. The Valkyrie girls are abducting guys. That's obvious from the first time Elsa goes to a bar with second trope guy named Kjell (pronounced Chell with a hard 'ch'). Seriously? Two statuesque valkyries enter and mesmerize the whole bar, and try to pick up Kjell. Elsa saves him, and the two valkyries - as a professional courtesy if you can handle that, let her get away with it, recognizing Elsa as one of their own, and simply leave peaceably. Ri-ight! These women only take boys - the best, the strongest, and the smartest, we're told - but we’re not told what they do with them, and no police authority seems to have any interest whatsoever in doing their job, so already we're well beyond the realm of intelligent now.

This is when Elsa decides she will have to reverse the situation on her bother Graham by protecting him, but the day after he arrives, he goes out play soccer with Tucker, and Elsa refuses to go. Some guardian! Now the boys are here, however, Paulson starts pulling trope trick after trope trick out of the YA grab-bag of tired and tedious ruses (you know the one marked 'doggedly uninventive'?) to throw teen bodies together. We learn that trope Kjell is trope-stalking trope Elsa who's supposed to be this trope powerful being, yet who quite evidently needs trope rescuing by trope guys all the time, and who is blatantly manipulated time after time by Graham, Tucker, and Kjell into bending and giving in to doing things she doesn’t want to do. She's so pathetic and so completely the opposite of the image we’re expected to swallow here: tall, powerful, beautiful, driven, dedicated Valkyrie women.

About those Valkyries (actually, it's valkyrja (plural valkyrjur but we get none of that in this authentic tale...)! In reality (that is, in mythological reality, if that makes sense) a Valkyrie (which literally means one who chooses the dead) is a female who chooses which soldiers die in battle. Of those who do die, fifty percent are taken by the valkyrie to Valhalla for Odin to rule over. The other fifty percent ends up under Freya's supervision at Fólkvangr. valkyries are associated with ravens, but also with swans and horses. The valkyries are not solely the domain of Norse mythology, according to wikipedia. Old English references wælcyrge and wælcyrie which are thought to be similar beings.

Because those old Norse names are so obscure (and unpronounceable!), Paulson does not use them, but she also, it seems, fails to try and approximate them using more familiar names. All names mean something, and in particular, older names were simply names of real world objects and events. Rose is named after the flower, April is named after the month. Melissa is named after bees (or honey, I forget which). Some wonderful examples of Old Norse Valkyrie names from wikipedia are: Geirskögul, Göll, Göndul, Gunnr, Herfjötur, Hrist, Mist, Ráðgríð, Skeggjöld, Skögul, and Skuld.

These names also mean things, like shield-bearer and other suitably militaristic (or even peaceable) themes. It would not be that hard to find a name that's appropriately warrior-like, but which sounds more modern. Paulson chickens out and names one of her Valkyrie 'Astrid', which is ultimately from áss and fríðr, and which means 'god-beautiful'. That's hardly a fierce Valkyrie name as judged by the ancient names which were given to these beings! The only one of these which she does avail herself is Hildr, which she renders as Hilda - Elsa's grandmother's name.

Tucker is an Australian term for food, and Tuck is an old British term for it, which is funny because Paulson writes, on page 236, "While Tuck was in the kitchen, foraging for food…"

The first problem which Paulson has here is that she's playing into the common misperception that valkyries were fierce warriors when in actual fact they were servants and serving girls, minions at best, in Norse mythology. The second problem is that even if we agree to gloss over this error and say, "Fine, let's go with your changes, and let's see where you take it", where she takes it is down entirely the wrong road. Instead of being a strong female character, Elsa persistently defers to others and she's constantly needy of Tucker, and at the mercy of others. Indeed, at one point, this loose-living and irresponsible guy Tucker takes charge and "trains" the Valkyrie! This tells us that Elsa is indeed a minion and not at all a fierce warrior, so either way this goes, Paulson gets it wrong. Even the cover artist agrees that Elsa isn’t ready for prime time since he puts a shadowy guy in the background ready to pick her up when she falls!

That's pretty much where I lost any hope for this novel, and indeed for Paulson herself if she couldn't see the damage she was doing to her main character by so completely subjugating her to this the trope 'love' interest. The novel was close enough to the end at that point, that I thought I should finish it just to see precisely what kind of a train-wreck it becomes, but this novel doesn't so much come off the rials as become subsumed by them.

I was so saddened that Paulson has taken what could have been a majorly kick-ass concept and main character, and has castrated the whole thing with the blunt knife of teen trope. She's taken a falcon and clipped its wings and tamed it. She's taken a wolf and put a collar on its neck and fluffy bootees on its feet and she wants us to buy it as a guard dog. That's why you've probably never heard of this novel, and that's why it’s gone nowhere. It has nothing to offer that four-score and teen other YA novels haven’t already spewed-up just as rankly.

Elsa and Tucker get to spend the night "together" in a hotel room, and Tucker lives up to his name - tucking her into bed like she's a child. I'm sorry, is this supposed to make me think it’s true love? The next day they go to a soccer game planning on yet again confronting Astrid. This would be what, the fourth ineffectual time? It’s just as ineffectual this time as the previous three ineffectual times. Here’s a serious problem: Astrid is abducting boys left, right, and center and in public, yet there's absolutely no police involvement whatsoever. When Graham is abducted, the very last thing in the world that Tucker and Elsa think of, is calling the police. They're morons. This novel is entirely unrealistic.

Here's further proof: before they go to the soccer game they spend the morning practicing shooting with a hand-gun which Tucker appropriated from Hilda's house, yet when they see Astrid taking a guy from the soccer stadium, they do nothing to stop her or confront her. At this point Elsa knows that to gain power she must defeat a Valkyrie or have one surrender to her, yet she fails to use the gun either to get Astrid to surrender or to simply take her out and end this. She's had this hammered into her head repeatedly: defeating a Valkyrie or having one surrender is the only way to increase one's own power (so much for a sisterhood!), yet she cannot get this into her thick skull no matter what. She's quite simply stupid.

This assessment is adequately confirmed when she abandons the gun for an old rusty sword she finds under the floorboards in her grandmother's house. Yeah: you had your under-aged, inexperienced ass handed to you four times, so now instead of shooting the bitch, finishing this once and for all, and getting your brother back, you're going to challenge the Über-warrior goddess to a sword fight! I guess she really doesn't care that much about her bro' after all. But who knows - new magical powers come out of her ass whenever she needs them, and they arrive without any trial, skill, or test, without build-up, training, or preamble, so why not? And about those powers? If she doesn’t become a Valkyrie until 18, from whence all this power and all these skills? It makes no sense. It’s all deus ex asinine.

Tucker is nothing but a waste of ink, tacked-on because (and with only a few much-admired and appreciated exceptions) YA writers in general don’t have the first clue how to create a female main character without making her a vestigial appendage of some trope guy. Here's how badly pervasive this is: I read one review of this novel where the reviewer said that they liked the fact that Tucker allowed Elsa to grow into her character - like she was Tucker's property and she must have his permission and indulgence before she can be all that she can be?! Maybe the reviewer didn’t mean it that way, but that's not the only time I've encountered that kind of mindset in a review - like girls are still nothing more than chattel and possessions of men. How much longer are female YA authors going to hobble their creations like this, and keep hammering this into their young and impressionable female readers that they're nothing without a guy? Criminal is what it is.

This story is so badly written that even though the valkyries have been seen repeatedly abducting guys, and Elsa hasn’t been seen doing that even once, and she has lost her own brother, this psycho moron Margit (obviously with emphasis on the last syllable) is obsessed with insulting Elsa, who never once kicks her ass or punches her out. That's the kind of worthless 'warrior' she is. She's a disgrace even to the fictional wuss of a valkyrie which Paulson has invented here. The absurd thing is that Margit then does a complete 180 and suddenly allies herself with Elsa after spewing nothing but hatred and invective the minute before. This writing is pathetic, amateur, and lacks all believability.

The really laughable thing is that Margit marshals the resources of her vigilante network: this is the worthless crew which has been romping around and maintaining radio contact with each other, and carrying guns, and which has never once stopped a Valkyrie abduction! Elsa plans on planting one of the vigilante's beacons on Astrid to track her to her lair (or is it layer cake?), but they already tried that and Elsa discovered that she couldn't follow her into the Norse realm because she's not yet a full Valkyrie. This rite of passage happens at eighteen for reasons unspecified, and at that point Elsa had not defeated a fellow Valkyrie, no had she had one surrender to her. In short, this is a waste of time and yet more bad writing, but Paulson pulls a easy win out of somewhere so Elsa can qualify. How convenient.

This novel is godawful trash, period.


Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë


Title: Wuthering Heights
Author: Emily Brontë
Publisher: Digiview Entertainment
Rating: WARTY!

This is part of a trilogy of reviews centered around Wuthering Heights, including Withering Tights and the amusingly titled Wuthering High by Cara Lockwood. Only one of the three I did I find to be a worthy read, and it wasn't this one.

This novel should have been titled Wuthering Shite, it's such a huge, teetering pile of festering excrement. This is, without any shadow of a doubt, absolutely the worst audio book I've ever had to stomach. The cover says that it's narrated by Tiffany Clark, who is useless, but it's also co-narrated by a guy, who goes completely uncredited. I understand his desire to remain anonymous given that he is without question the worst reader of anyone I've ever encountered, audio-book or not, professional or amateur. He is completely pathetic in every sense. He can't pronounce any word that is longer than three syllables. Neither of them can do a British accent, let alone a Yorkshire one. Both of these dickheads read it with American accents because they are Americans. From what I can gather, Tiffany Clark is a retired porn actress, and the guy might well be her ex, Fred Lincoln, but these are just guesses. Both of them are only semi-literate as judged by their horrendous litany of mispronounced words.

That's why, even though this novel is set in Yorkshire, a county I love and from which both my parents hail, I cannot recommend this novel. And it's not just the audio version, it's the novel itself, as well. I swear, if Emily Brontë, aka Ellis Bell, were alive today, she'd be living in LA and writing trashy scripts for daytime soaps. Do please note the cover image above. This is a photograph of Cathy taken precisely at the moment when Heathcliff put his right boot tip up her snotty, smart-mouthing arse.

This was a wretched trash-heap of a racist novel and the reading, by people with American accents had to be a joke, right? There was no chemistry so why the publisher thought this would work was a complete and utter mystery of Holmesian proportions. The story already was nauseating, but it was rendered more so by the vomit coming from these readers' mouths.

This novel, which teaches that Romany people are nothing but child-abandoning and violent scum would never have gained publication for itself (except as a self-published novel), had it been written today. Here, as a public service, so you never have to read this novel and suffer through it yourself, is a précis!

Lockwood, having seen bizarre dysfunctional behaviors at the home of his landlord, abusive bastard Heathcliff, and dreamed of the ghost of Psycho Bitch trying to get through his window, gets the lowdown on the action from his own housekeeper, Nelly Dean. This is the start of a confusing babble of multiple PoV historical accounts of events in which Nelly can recall word for word conversations from thirty years before, including the exact wording of a letter, and can describe events to which she was never party. A-friggin'-mazing!

Heathcliff was an apparent Romany child who was adopted by Earnshaw and who through cheating, intimidation, and subterfuge rises to own Earnshaw's home. His co-dependent and vilely dysfunctional relationship with Catherine is the Gothic romance which people have praised almost since this abortion of a work of so-called literature was published. Even Brontë's own sister thought it was so bad that she edited it extensively after the novel had killed its author (evidently she died of a broken heart after realizing what a lousy piece of crap she'd foisted upon the unsuspecting public).

There follows a litany of bullshit and crap, with bad people doing worse things to losers, some of whom even deserve what they get, but in the end, Cathy dies, and Heathcliff is still a jerk. The best part of the novel is when they're both lying next to each other in the ground, dead and rotting, just as each of them spent their entire life.

I thoroughly recommend this novel for toilet paper - but not the CD version - it's kinda hard to wipe with CDs and you can't even rumple them up first.


Monday, June 2, 2014

How the García Girls Lost Their Accents by Julia Alvarez


Title: How the García Girls Lost Their Accents
Author: Julia Alvarez
Publisher: Algonquin
Rating: WARTY!

I picked up this novel (in audio book form) because it was in a list of the top 100 best novels. Indeed, it was number 2, and it stunk just as badly as number 2 as it turned out. If this was second in the list it doesn't speak well for the other 98, because this novel was one of the most boring novels I have ever read. It was tedious and pedantic and had quite literally nothing to offer, much less anything new or interesting to say.

It's told in reverse chronological order (for no apparent reason unless you count 'pretentious' and 'artsy-fartsy' as reasons). It's in three parts for no good reason, and the time periods these parts cover have the most recent time first, like 1970 - 1960, for example, but the three parts are chronological, and within each, the story is related chronologically (as far as it's possible to tell), so I don't get what's with the theatrics over the "Oh look how inventive and artistic we are, doing it backwards" schema here. It just seemed absurdly artificial and pretentious to me.

Maybe that wouldn't have been so bad had there been some substance to it, but the story, which is apparently autobiographical) has nothing whatsoever to relate. It's all been done before. It's supposed to be about a dramatic escape from an authoritarian Dominican Republic and the subsequent life in the USA - how this rich and privileged family which had multiple servants had to come and live like the rest of us do in the USA. How awful for them! And: who cares?

It's nothing more than the boring, trivial, day-to-day life of four girls and their parents. Every character is demeaned by using diminutive nicknames (for the girls, that is when they're not simply dismissed altogether as "the girls"), or oddball descriptions rather than names for the adults - like "the grandmother", "the mother", "the father", "the young man" and so on. I found that bizarre, especially since it's not consistent.

The family is frequently presented as being poor in the US, yet the girls go to boarding school. Really? They must have been tragically poor. Julia Alvarez seems not to have any idea what being poor actually means. OTOH, judged by the state of the girl's legs in the cover image, they do seem rather anorexic, don't they? One of the girls is punished for being in possession of marijuana by being sentenced to the Dominican Republic. Their glorious motherland is a punishment now?! I guess I just don't get this mentality!

I adore Hispanic accents, but that simply wasn't enough to save this from being completely and irremediably bland. The four girls are Carla, Sandra, Yolanda and Sofía, and each gets to tell a part of the story, but why do I care about the dolls they wanted or the red shoes one of them wanted? Why do we care about yet another trope Latino dad who is obsessively protective of his daughter's chastity and disowns her when she consciously chooses to lose it? There was nothing funny, nothing engrossing, nothing heart-rending, nothing astounding. There was nothing. I guess that's why it's worthy of a medal?

This story is mundane in the extreme if that even makes sense. These are the same everyday events which everyone else has to tell and which are just as uninteresting. This was like one of those tedious TV daytime melodramas on the BBC featuring ordinary people doing ordinary things with nothing out of the ordinary happening. Nothing went on here which didn't affect a host of other people in exactly the same unspectacular way, so what makes this story special? Nothing. The writing wasn't even beautiful to at least ameliorate the tedium in some small measure, and allow us to pretend that this is literature, so I can't recommend this, not even as a punishment!

My advice is to listen to West Side of Town by Tish Hinojosa. She offers a better look at Hispanic immigrant life in her song, which I believe can be found on her Homeland album. That's autobiographical, too, and a much better story.


Sunday, June 1, 2014

The Devil's Concubine by Jill Braden


Title: The Devil's Concubine
Author: Jill Braden
Publisher: Wayzgoose Press
Rating: Worthy!


DISCLOSURE: Unlike the majority of reviews in this blog, I've neither bought this book nor borrowed it from the library. This is a "galley" copy ebook, supplied by Net Galley. I'm not receiving (nor will I expect to receive or accept) remuneration for this review.

The Devil's Concubine is another exercise in making sure you choose a unique title for your novel. Barnes & Noble lists six titles with this name and that doesn't even include Palle Schmidt's graphic novel with this same title. The cover art is exquisite, although I don't normally address covers because the author typically has little or nothing to do with them. This blog is about writing! This novel is evidently the first in a series. The sequel, The Devil Incarnate is already available and the author is working on the third in this unique series.

Jill Braden is a fellow blogspotter, although I don't know her. From her blog (link above) it sounds like she writes pretty much like I do (in terms of basic approach) which is a bit nice to know, and it looks like she blogs about her writing as she goes. I've never recommended a writer's blog before, although I always link to it if I can find a link, but in this case I will make an exception because it looks like she's all about writing too, something which I have to say I admire and in which I find a lot of comfort! Her blog is not one of those nothing-but-promote-myself blogs like all-too-many writer's blogs seem to be to me. Please go take a look.

Braden's is actually a dynamic blog. I love, for example, that she's a Doctor Who fan, and that she gets so passionate about Irene Adler from the British series revived by Doctor Who head writer Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss: Sherlock You can find my refutation of the standard criticisms of the Lara Pulver episode here. I think too many people, several of whom are purportedly feminists, sadly got this wrong in their quite evidently undue haste to condemn Moffat's Adler, and I think they will realize how wrong they got it when Irene Adler returns. Of course, I could be wrong (I often am!), but we'll see.

The critics' main problem, in my opinion, is in first of all misunderstanding Adler in the original Doyle version, and thereby pumping her up into something she was actually not and second, in misunderstanding Moffat's version even more than they have misunderstood Doyle's. That's not to say that their criticism is entirely without foundation, but I think such criticism needs to be much more realistic than it has hitherto shown itself to be.

What bothers me about Braden's criticism is that she's a writer herself! If she's so outraged by it, why doesn't she take up the challenge and write her own Adler story? That I'd like to see, especially since she appears (from what I've read of her blog so far) to share many of my own views on strong female characters! Indeed, I had several fleeting ideas for my own Adler story once I'd caught up with all the jetsam in the wake of Moffat's juggernaut version of the tale. I volunteer to co-write it with her to make sure both male and female perspectives are adequately represented; then let people come and criticize our effort! Bring it on!

But I digress! In several ways, this novel reminds me of Kushiel's Dart by Jacqueline Carey, which I also reviewed, although it's a very different story. It does have a similar vibe in that, for example, the main protagonist is a woman of pleasure who is subjected to some pain (not willingly, and nowhere near as much in this novel as in the other), and who is in a position of some power which she can wield only in secret or indirectly. Like Kushiel's Dart, it's also well-written: beautifully expressive and evocative. Some might find the story a little slow-moving to begin with (I did not), but that makes it only more suggestive of the roller-coaster that it is, and once it gets going, there's no stopping it. You will want to ride it to the end, and then get on again (in volume 2!).

The name, QuiTai sounds remarkably like the name of my favorite female character of all time: Kitai from the Codex Alera series by Jim Butcher. Talk about strong females! Of course, that does depend upon how the name is supposed to be pronounced, but there's no guide offered to that end, so I'll pronounce it how I choose, thank you very much! This QuiTai is nowhere near in that Kitai's league, but she's definitely worth following.

In this novel, too, the main character is an alien, but in this case, a humanoid with some snake traits. I'd gage her to be the first cousin to the snake on the tree in Eden if I believed in fairy tales: she definitely has the same skill set! Like some snakes, QuiTai has collapsible venomous fangs in her sweet mouth, and the venom can be used, in moderation, to summon her oracle god, into the mouth of those she injects, enabling them to foretell future events for QuiTai, although as usual with this kind of thing, it doesn't seem to do her much good, or to keep her out of trouble!

The Devil in this story, is a werewolf pack-leader named Petrof; a disgusting animal of a man, who nevertheless somehow manages to evoke passion (either in the form of anger or of pure lust) within QuiTai. She's the concubine to this werewolf, but given that he has no wife, I'm not convinced that 'concubine' is technically the correct term. I freely grant that it makes for a much more intriguing title, however. Be advised that I am not a fan of werewolf stories, so I launched into this with some trepidation, although by the halfway point, I'd decided that this was not a drawback for me, and I was quite happy with where this novel went and how it turned out. This is not your grandmother's werewolf story! Indeed, it isn't a werewolf story at all, not in the big picture.

QuiTai lives on a island - an occupied island where the colonists rule everything, and where exotic beings of several hues and varieties coexist. It's rather reminiscent of North America in the mid-eighteenth century, ruled from afar and bearing a heavy tax burden, but the characters which populate this tale make the colonists and their overlords look like characters out of a children's story book! Just as QuiTai is being picked-up to visit her master to serve his animal needs, she receives a secret note from someone she considers to be her arch enemy: an artist named Kyam Kul. He's of the same race as that which is occupying the island, and he hails from a wealthy family from which he's apparently all but exiled in disgrace. And he's also not an artist. Not in his soul, at any rate.

What he wants from her she does not know, but she finds it intriguing that right at the point where she has been having indefinable feelings that something is seriously amiss on the island somehow, somewhere, her enemy has reached out to her. She has to talk The Devil into letting her pose for a portrait in order to get time with Kyam to find out what he wants - and whether what he wants will serve her interests adequately. I confess I was a bit disappointed that more was not made of the scene where he starts to draw her. I saw a potential for some very subtle eroticism there, which failed to materialize, but it's rather hard to be so sensual when there's sand blowing into every crevice...!

From that point onwards, the story is one of intrigue, adventure, danger, and death, and I loved every minute of it. It's a very original tale with some unexpected story devices to keep the interest boiling and move the plot along organically, not artificially. Everything fits and everything works. It did slow down for me in the second half, a little bit, but by then I had enough investment in it that I wasn't going to let that get in my way. Overall, it's professionally written and very entrancing. This is a story that makes all the poor ones worth wading through just to find something as seductive as this. I recommend it highly.